Brookings
·
Published
July 5, 2024

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.

Overview:

This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.

  • The first presidential debate of 2024 has resulted in a noticeable shift in voter preferences, increasing former President Trump's lead by 2 percentage points.
  • President Biden faces compounded challenges from previous issues that have negatively impacted his public standing, which were intensified by his debate performance.

Key Quotes:

  • “Since 1976, the first debate of a presidential year has shifted voters’ preferences by an average of 2.4 percentage points during the two weeks following the debate, almost always against the incumbent president (or the incumbent’s party when the president is not running for reelection).”
  • “In the past three presidential elections, the first debate has moved voters’ preferences by an average of 2.8 percentage points. And because we are closely as well as deeply divided, with elections decided by small margins, changes of this size can be decisive.”

What They Discuss:

  • The 2 percentage point shift toward Trump is significant and has altered the dynamics between the candidates. Trump's lead grew from 1.5 points before the debate to 3.5 points afterward.
  • Due to larger margins in Blue states, Democrats require a substantial lead in the popular vote to win the Electoral College. Biden's 4.5-point margin in 2020 was barely enough to secure victory.
  • Post-debate, Biden's situation demands an improvement of at least 5 points in the popular vote to ensure an Electoral College win.
  • The debate exacerbated existing problems for Biden, including doubts about his age and leadership capabilities, high prices, and immigration issues.
  • Biden's inability to effectively defend his record has heightened concerns and has not stemmed the calls within his party for him to withdraw from the race.

What They Recommend:

  • The article does not directly provide policy recommendations but highlights the necessity for Biden to address his weaknesses and public doubts.
  • It implies an urgency for a strategic turnaround to regain voter confidence and secure his position in the race.

Key Takeaways:

  • The first debate has significantly impacted voter preferences, favoring Trump by enhancing his lead.
  • President Biden needs a considerable boost in the popular vote to win the Electoral College, compounded by existing public doubts and criticisms.
  • The debate has only intensified the challenges facing Biden, putting additional pressure on his campaign to find effective solutions swiftly.

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels

Summary

Manufacturing employment growth in the U.S. has been modest since returning to pre-pandemic levels, indicating underlying weaknesses. This trend suggests that while some gains are highlighted, broad improvements for middle-class workers remain elusive, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals

Summary

President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs will significantly raise prices for many imported goods, especially electronics, machinery, and vehicles. These changes will put financial pressure on American consumers and businesses alike, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.  

Center
Blog
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary
  • William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings discuss the importance of presidential debates in addressing voter concerns, highlighting Kamala Harris's effort to define herself and correct misconceptions about her political stance and capabilities.
  • The commentary asserts that Donald Trump's debate performance was inconsistent, often veering off-topic and failing to broaden his appeal beyond his base, indicating a potential challenge for his campaign in attracting new supporters.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.