Heritage Foundation
·
Published
November 2, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Share this article

Summary

  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.

Overview:

This commentary by Kevin D. Roberts, Ph.D., President, and J.D. Vance, U.S. Senator for Ohio, published by The Heritage Foundation, discusses the issue of U.S. aid to Israel in the context of the Ukraine war funding. The authors argue against holding up Israel's aid to further support Ukraine's war efforts.

  • They emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Having failed to force through more Ukraine funding by tying it to disaster relief for Americans, Senate leadership is now using the crisis in Israel as a 'Plan B' to get the Biden administration’s funding request across the finish line."
  2. "America cannot project strength abroad unless we are truly strong at home. Today, we honor this founding principle by standing with Israel."

What They Discuss:

  • The recent terrorist attack by Hamas against Israel, resulting in significant casualties, including American citizens.
  • The need for U.S. military support for Israel to respond to the escalating war and defend its people.
  • The assertion that the U.S. focus on Ukraine has come at the expense of other allies like Israel and Taiwan.
  • The strategic importance of Israel as a democratic U.S. partner compared to Ukraine's situation.
  • The need for a clear strategy and transparency in U.S. foreign involvement, especially considering domestic challenges and limited resources.​

What They Recommend:

  • Congress should debate and vote on the situation in Israel separately from Ukraine funding.
  • The U.S. should focus on securing its own borders and fully enforcing immigration laws, considering threats from terrorist organizations.
  • Conservatives should insist on strengthening the U.S. domestic industrial base and defending strategic interests.
  • The U.S. should stand with Israel in its time of need, honoring the principle of "peace through strength."

Key Takeaways:

  • The commentary calls for a balanced approach in U.S. foreign policy, ensuring that support for Israel is not compromised by the focus on Ukraine.
  • It highlights the importance of differentiating responses to distinct international conflicts.
  • The authors urge the U.S. to maintain its commitment to key allies and prioritize national security interests.​

This is a brief overview of the commentary from The Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels

Summary

Manufacturing employment growth in the U.S. has been modest since returning to pre-pandemic levels, indicating underlying weaknesses. This trend suggests that while some gains are highlighted, broad improvements for middle-class workers remain elusive, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals

Summary

President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs will significantly raise prices for many imported goods, especially electronics, machinery, and vehicles. These changes will put financial pressure on American consumers and businesses alike, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.  

Center
Blog
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary
  • William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings discuss the importance of presidential debates in addressing voter concerns, highlighting Kamala Harris's effort to define herself and correct misconceptions about her political stance and capabilities.
  • The commentary asserts that Donald Trump's debate performance was inconsistent, often veering off-topic and failing to broaden his appeal beyond his base, indicating a potential challenge for his campaign in attracting new supporters.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.