Atlantic Council
·
Published
January 25, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.

Overview: 

This article was written by Frederick Kempe, President and CEO of the Atlantic Council, discussing the geopolitical implications of former US President Donald Trump's influence on international relations as he gains momentum in the political arena.

  • Foreign governments are increasingly considering the 'Trump put'—delaying decisions in anticipation of potentially more favorable negotiations with the US if Trump returns to power, establishing a baseline for their negotiations.
  • Conversely, some nations are seeking a 'Trump hedge' by preparing for the adverse effects his potential return could have on their strategic options, particularly concerning security and trade policies.

Key Quotes:

  • “Some foreign governments are increasingly factoring into their relationship with the United States what may come to be known as the ‘Trump put’—delaying choices in the expectation they will be able to negotiate better deals with Washington a year from now.”
  • “This year promises to be a year of danger as countries around the world watch US politics with a combination of disbelief, fascination, horror, and hope.”

What They Discuss:

  • Russian President Vladimir Putin is speculated to be delaying significant decisions regarding the Ukraine war, betting on Trump's election promise to end the conflict swiftly, which could potentially favor Russia.
  • European NATO members and Ukraine are exploring ways to bolster their defense capabilities in anticipation of Trump's questioning of NATO's purpose and mission, which could undermine alliance security guarantees.
  • The article highlights global concerns over Trump's trade policies, including his promise to impose a ten percent tariff on all imports, affecting international trade dynamics.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
  • A national leader in Davos expressed concerns over the decreasing predictability of US foreign policy, which complicates other countries' policy-making processes.

What They Recommend:

The article implies the need for countries to adapt their strategies in anticipation of potential shifts in US foreign policy under Trump's influence, though specific recommendations are not provided.

Key Takeaways:

  • The potential return of Donald Trump to the US presidency is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations (the 'Trump put') and others preparing for less favorable outcomes (the 'Trump hedge').
  • The geopolitical landscape is marked by increased uncertainty and strategic adjustments by both US allies and adversaries in response to Trump's political resurgence.
  • The evolving dynamics underscore the importance of adaptability and strategic foresight in international relations amid the unpredictability of US foreign policy.

This is a brief overview of Frederick Kempe's work from the Atlantic Council. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels

Summary

Manufacturing employment growth in the U.S. has been modest since returning to pre-pandemic levels, indicating underlying weaknesses. This trend suggests that while some gains are highlighted, broad improvements for middle-class workers remain elusive, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals

Summary

President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs will significantly raise prices for many imported goods, especially electronics, machinery, and vehicles. These changes will put financial pressure on American consumers and businesses alike, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.  

Center
Blog
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary
  • William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings discuss the importance of presidential debates in addressing voter concerns, highlighting Kamala Harris's effort to define herself and correct misconceptions about her political stance and capabilities.
  • The commentary asserts that Donald Trump's debate performance was inconsistent, often veering off-topic and failing to broaden his appeal beyond his base, indicating a potential challenge for his campaign in attracting new supporters.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.