Cato Institute
·
Published
December 29, 2024

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Share this article

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

The issue:  

The core challenge lies in addressing the complex and resilient nature of drug cartels in Mexico, which continue to thrive despite previous military efforts. Proposals for U.S. military action overlook historical insights, where past interventions did not eliminate cartel influence and often worsened violence.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

Past military actions have shown that cartels adapt quickly, with violence often increasing despite tactical victories. Moreover, military incursions could severely damage U.S.-Mexico relations, which are crucial for joint efforts in managing migration and countering China’s growing influence. Understanding local dynamics and political support is essential for any proposed solution, highlighting the complexity of the issue.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Cut the government with a scalpel, not an axe
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Cut the government with a scalpel, not an axe

Summary

Cutting federal government spending under the Trump administration may harm essential public services, creating significant backlash from citizens. Disruption caused by deep cuts could lead to political repercussions, complicating the government's efficiency goals, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Denial Without Disaster—Keeping a U.S.-China Conflict over Taiwan Under the Nuclear Threshold
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Denial Without Disaster—Keeping a U.S.-China Conflict over Taiwan Under the Nuclear Threshold

Summary

The U.S. must navigate the complexities of a potential Taiwan conflict concerning China while preventing nuclear escalation. The evolving nature of China's nuclear capabilities demands a more nuanced approach from the U.S. military, especially regarding its operational strategies, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

Center
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Gender Wars Are an Early Warning Sign for Authoritarianism
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Gender Wars Are an Early Warning Sign for Authoritarianism

Summary

Gender wars highlight the rise of authoritarianism globally, as seen in Georgia's struggle for democracy against Russian influence. Women leaders across various nations are pivotal in resisting these trends, emphasizing their essential role in safeguarding freedoms and rights, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

Center
Commentary
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Can the world trading system survive Donald Trump?
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can the world trading system survive Donald Trump?

Summary

The world trading system faces significant challenges due to proposed tariffs by the U.S. president, notably a 60% tariff on China. These actions threaten to disrupt global trade and create tensions among member nations, as they debate their responses to this situation, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics. 

Center
Speech
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.