RAND Corporation
·
Published
July 11, 2024

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Share this article

Summary

  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.

Overview:

This article was written by Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation, highlighting two key insights:

  • Russia continues to solidify its presence and strategic partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, countering U.S. influence and leveraging relationships with China and North Korea.
  • Despite Russia's active engagement, its influence in the Indo-Pacific is still considerably less significant than that of China and the United States.

Key Quotes:

  • "Although the Kremlin seems to desire a Cold War II–style bloc standoff between the West and East, it is unlikely to succeed in the Indo-Pacific region."
  • "While Russia's sway is not at the level of China's or the United States', it is certainly enough to promote its anti-Western interests and disrupt the already precarious regional order."

What They Discuss:

  • Between May and June, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited China, North Korea, and Vietnam to reinforce strategic alliances, also meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
  • Half of Southeast Asia, much of South Asia, and nearly all Pacific Island countries abstained from participating in the Ukraine peace summit in Switzerland, underscoring Russia's influence.
  • While Russia lacks substantial economic offerings beyond arms and oil to Indo-Pacific nations, it strives to counter U.S. "hegemony" and distract from its actions in Ukraine.
  • Russia and North Korea renewed a 1961 defense pact, potentially heightening tensions with South Korea and affecting Seoul's stance on military aid to Ukraine.
  • North Korea has sent over 11,000 containers of munitions to Moscow since a September 2023 meeting, stemming from an agreement for mutual military aid and technical support.

What They Recommend:

  • The United States should avoid overreacting to the Russia–North Korea defense pact, recognizing that Russian military intervention in the Indo-Pacific is improbable while its focus remains on Ukraine.
  • Washington should focus on building its Indo-Pacific strategy without being distracted by Moscow's attempts to sow discord.

Key Takeaways:

  • Russia aims to establish strong strategic relationships in the Indo-Pacific as a counterbalance to U.S. influence, particularly aligning with China and North Korea.
  • Indo-Pacific nations are largely pursuing nonalignment strategies rather than forming rigid alliances with Moscow or Beijing.
  • The Kremlin's current influence is enough to disrupt regional dynamics and foster anti-Western sentiment, but it does not yet parallel the strategic weight of China or the U.S.
  • A cautious and measured U.S. response is advisable, maintaining focus on broader Indo-Pacific strategies without becoming overly concerned with Russia's maneuvers.

This is a brief overview of the article by Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels

Summary

Manufacturing employment growth in the U.S. has been modest since returning to pre-pandemic levels, indicating underlying weaknesses. This trend suggests that while some gains are highlighted, broad improvements for middle-class workers remain elusive, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals

Summary

President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs will significantly raise prices for many imported goods, especially electronics, machinery, and vehicles. These changes will put financial pressure on American consumers and businesses alike, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.  

Center
Blog
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary
  • William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings discuss the importance of presidential debates in addressing voter concerns, highlighting Kamala Harris's effort to define herself and correct misconceptions about her political stance and capabilities.
  • The commentary asserts that Donald Trump's debate performance was inconsistent, often veering off-topic and failing to broaden his appeal beyond his base, indicating a potential challenge for his campaign in attracting new supporters.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.