Brookings
·
Published
September 1, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.

Overview:

This article, featuring contributions from Patricia M. Kim, Matthew Turpin, Joseph S. Nye Jr., Jessica Chen Weiss, Eun A Jo, Ryan Hass, and Emilie Kimball, explores the question of whether the U.S. should pursue a new Cold War with China.

  • The authors debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • They discuss the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, including economic interdependence and differing political systems.

Key Quotes:

  1. "China does not pose an existential threat to the U.S. homeland or way of life." - Patricia M. Kim
  2. "The United States and China are deeply suspicious of and hostile to the worldview of the other." - Matthew Turpin

What They Discuss:

  • The U.S. and China are in a state of competition, but it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence.
  • China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
  • The U.S. needs a nuanced strategy to address China's military ambitions, economic practices, and diplomatic influence.
  • The debate considers whether the U.S. should engage in containment strategies or seek a more cooperative approach.
  • The authors emphasize the importance of understanding China's perspective and the potential consequences of U.S. policies.

What They Recommend:

  • A multidimensional approach to U.S.-China relations, balancing competition with cooperation where possible.
  • Strengthening alliances and international institutions to shape China's external behavior.
  • Avoiding total economic decoupling, which would be costly and counterproductive.
  • Developing strategies that consider the long-term implications of U.S. actions on the global order.

Key Takeaways:

  • The U.S.-China relationship is complex and requires a careful, strategic approach that differs from past Cold War tactics.
  • Economic interdependence and global challenges like climate change necessitate some level of cooperation.
  • The U.S. should focus on shaping China's behavior through alliances, international institutions, and domestic strength.

This is a brief overview of the aforementioned work from the Brookings Institution. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit

Summary
  • Robert Benson at Center for American Progress writes that the 75th NATO Summit underscored the urgency of paving a clear membership path for Ukraine and strengthening Eastern Europe's defenses against Russian aggression, marking vital steps for the alliance's future.
  • The column asserts that Washington must ensure all NATO members meet their defense spending commitments and enhance cybersecurity to tackle sophisticated threats, while also expanding NATO’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s growing military assertiveness.
Progressive
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops

Summary
  • President Biden's public statements on the drone attack that killed 3 U.S. soldiers in Jordan shows the U.S. is keen to avoid war with Iran while focusing on Hezbollah's activities.
  • The drone attack represents a significant escalation, marking the first US military casualty by enemy air power since 1953 and prompting a strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah from aggressive engagements with US forces in Iraq and Syria.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.