Center for American Progress
·
Published
August 3, 2020

The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits

Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Maggie Jo Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • Implementing an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices could help better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.

Overview:

This article, written by Maggie Jo Buchanan, addresses the need for implementing term limits for U.S. Supreme Court Justices to reflect modern societal changes.

  • Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • The article suggests that term limits could help the Supreme Court better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "The average justice’s term is now longer than it has been at any other point in U.S. history."
  2. "Regular appointments, however, would hopefully make the confirmation process less political."

What They Discuss:

  •  The average age of Supreme Court justices has remained static, but their terms have lengthened due to increased life expectancy.
  • Longer terms have led to justices having more power and influence over American life, more so than other branches of government.
  • The political nature of the confirmation process has intensified, with Senate leaders and presidents incentivized to secure ideologically aligned justices.
  • Proposals for term limits, such as an 18-year nonrenewable limit, are gaining momentum and support from various legal academics and justices.
  • Term limits could ensure more regular turnover, making the court more reflective of the public and less influenced by political agendas.

What They Recommend:

  • Implement an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices.
  • Ensure a more regular appointment process to reflect the broader public and reduce political tensions.
  • Allow justices to continue working in a senior status after their term ends, maintaining their contributions to the judiciary.
  • Consider statutory limits for term limits, either retrospectively or prospectively.

Key Takeaways:

  • The article emphasizes the need for Supreme Court term limits to address the challenges posed by longer tenures and increased politicization.
  • It argues that term limits would bring a healthier turnover and alignment with public sentiment, enhancing the court's legitimacy.
  • The recommendations aim to balance the need for experienced justices with the benefits of regular new appointments.​

This is a brief overview of Maggie Jo Buchanan's work from the Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.