Cato Institute
·
Published
December 28, 2023
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article
Summary
- Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
- Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Overview:
- This article was written by Robert A. Levy, discussing the complex issue of Donald Trump's potential disqualification from running for president in 2024.
- The author critically examines the legal and constitutional implications surrounding the disqualification debate, focusing on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its application.
Key Quotes:
- "No person shall … hold any office … who, having previously [served] … as an officer of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection."
- "The US Constitution is not a legal code; it’s a set of broad principles that implement a framework for governance."
What They Discuss:
- Levy analyzes Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot and the subsequent legal challenges leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement.
- The article addresses critical legal questions, including who has standing to file suit and whether states can define "engaging in insurrection."
- It scrutinizes whether the term "Officer of the United States" in the Fourteenth Amendment applies to elected officials like Trump.
- The distinction between disqualification from holding office and running for office is explored, with reference to various state court rulings.
- The article considers the constitutional framework for governance and the potential political repercussions of disqualifying Trump without a criminal conviction.
What They Recommend:
- Levy suggests a careful interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, emphasizing its historical context and legal precedents.
- The author recommends that the Supreme Court provide clarity on the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Key Takeaways:
- The debate over Trump's disqualification centers on constitutional interpretation, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
- The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for electoral law and the definition of insurrection in a political context.
- The issue raises broader questions about the balance between legal standards and political decision-making in the American democratic process.
This is a brief overview of Robert A. Levy's work from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left