Cato Institute
·
Published
July 9, 2024

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.

Overview:

This article was written by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute.

  • Key insights provided include the assertion that cosmopolitan support for globalization can coexist with opposition to a global government and that world government could potentially lead to substantial negative outcomes including authoritarianism.

Key Quotes:

  • "World government would be dangerous because people harmed by its policies could not 'vote with their feet' against it."
  • “We don’t need world government to solve the world’s problems.”

What They Discuss:

  • The debate over world government versus global governance, typically conflicted between cosmopolitan supporters and nationalist opponents.
  • World government could undermine diversity and beneficial competition among nation-states, as illustrated by the proposed global minimum tax by the OECD.
  • Political ignorance would be exacerbated under a global government, making it harder for voters to be well-informed about global policies.
  • A world government could make it impossible for individuals to migrate away from oppressive regimes, eliminating opportunities for “foot voting.”
  • Historical and hypothetical risks of world government turning into totalitarian regimes, potentially with catastrophic results.

What They Recommend:

  • Address global problems through cooperation between a few major powers rather than establishing a world government.
  • Utilize voluntary agreements and unilateral actions to solve international issues.
  • Promote migration rights and reduce barriers to immigration without the global government framework.
  • Stay cautious of empowering institutions of global governance that may pave the way to a world state.

Key Takeaways:

  • Even proponents of globalization can reasonably oppose the concept of world government due to the potential risks it poses.
  • Risks include loss of migration opportunities, stifling diversity and competition, exacerbating political ignorance, and potential for totalitarianism.
  • Many global challenges can be addressed effectively through international cooperation without centralized world governance.
  • Safeguarding against the dangers of world government requires critical analysis and careful measures to ensure local autonomy and effective global collaboration.

Disclaimer: 

This is a brief overview of the article by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China

Summary

Trump's threatened tariffs could lead to significant economic harm for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. These tariffs, if implemented, threaten to slow economic growth and increase inflation across all involved nations, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Commentary
·
Global Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook

Summary

The U.S.-China relationship currently faces significant rivalry that impacts collaboration, yet history shows that even rivals can work together on shared challenges. Understanding and advancing methods for cooperation among nonstate actors will be critical for addressing major global issues, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Issue Brief
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
8 Ways Special Interests Are Asking President-Elect Trump To Sell Out U.S. Public Lands
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

8 Ways Special Interests Are Asking President-Elect Trump To Sell Out U.S. Public Lands

Summary

Per commentary from Center for American Progress, President-elect Trump faces pressure from corporate lobbyists to prioritize special interests at the expense of public lands. The proposed actions threaten the environmental protections that Trump previously disavowed during his campaign.  

Progressive
Report
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.