Thinktanker Summary
AI-assisted summary reviewed by Thinktanker. While reasonable care is taken, errors may occur. Refer to the original source text for full accuracy.

Trump's threatened tariffs could lead to significant economic harm for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. These tariffs, if implemented, threaten to slow economic growth and increase inflation across all involved nations, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

AI-assisted summary reviewed by Thinktanker. While reasonable care is taken, errors may occur. Refer to the original source text for full accuracy.

Trump's proposed tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China could harm all involved economies, including the US. These measures aim to tackle illegal immigration and drug flows, according to a commentary by experts at Peterson Institute for International Economics.

The issue:  

Trump intends to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and a 10% tariff on China to address illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking. These tariffs threaten to disrupt highly integrated economies, potentially reducing US GDP by $200 billion and significantly slowing growth in all affected countries.

What they recommend:  

Experts advise renegotiating the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to avoid the economic damage from imposing tariffs. They suggest making concessions within the agreement to address US concerns and prevent the need for tariff imposition.

Go deeper:  

The analysis utilizes the G-Cubed model to project extensive GDP losses and increased inflation across the US, Mexico, Canada, and China if the tariffs are implemented. Mexico, heavily reliant on US exports, faces catastrophic economic impacts, potentially exacerbating illegal immigration incentives. Historical patterns indicate that Trump may not follow through on his tariff threats, as seen during his previous administration.

This is a brief overview of the commentary by experts at Peterson Institute for International Economics. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Every think tank. One newsletter.

Your new weekly briefing - curated from America’s top think tanks on Substack.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Video
Libertarian
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
No Result Found
We did not find any results for your search.

Your Think Tank Sidecar

Save and curate your own Readlists, create your own Dashboards, and more.
Got it