January 13, 2024

Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could hurt Trump’s quest for US energy dominance

Thinktanker Summary

Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico could significantly undermine U.S. energy dominance by raising domestic energy prices and disrupting critical supply chains. These actions may drive U.S. trading partners to seek alternatives, diminishing American competitiveness in energy exports, per commentary from Atlantic Council.

Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico could significantly undermine U.S. energy dominance by raising domestic energy prices and disrupting critical supply chains. These actions may drive U.S. trading partners to seek alternatives, diminishing American competitiveness in energy exports, per commentary from Atlantic Council.

The issue:  

Tariffs on energy imports present a critical challenge for U.S. energy markets, particularly as Canada accounts for about 62% of U.S. crude oil imports, followed by Mexico at approximately 7%. Such tariffs could lead to higher domestic energy costs and retaliatory actions from trading partners.

Go deeper:  

With U.S. refineries largely dependent on imported heavy crude, tariffs could spike consumer prices, especially in Midwest states lacking alternative supply options. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs in agricultural products from Mexico could severely impact U.S. natural gas exports, destabilizing domestic prices. The commentary warns that these trade barriers may inadvertently strengthen competitors like China in the energy market.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Atlantic Council. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Washington DC
Founded 1916
An influential Washington-based think tank focusing on global security, defense, and economic policy.
Liberal
Leans Right
Create your own think tank.
Get the insights shaping policy and power every week.
Join us on Substack + Linkedin.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Video
Libertarian