January 13, 2024
Common Good Diplomacy: A Framework for Stable U.S.–China Relations
Thinktanker Summary
AI-assisted summary reviewed by Thinktanker. While reasonable care is taken, errors may occur. Refer to the original source text for full accuracy.
  • The report argues that both the U.S. and China, as status quo powers, share an interest in a stable global security environment and an open global economy.
  • It suggests that diplomacy should focus on framing an inclusive global system, focusing on actions that reduce zero-sum constraints.
AI-assisted summary reviewed by Thinktanker. While reasonable care is taken, errors may occur. Refer to the original source text for full accuracy.

Overview:

This report by Jake Werner from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft discusses "Common Good Diplomacy" as a framework for stable U.S.-China relations.

  • The report argues that both the U.S. and China, as status quo powers, share an interest in a stable global security environment and an open global economy.
  • It suggests that diplomacy should focus on framing an inclusive global system, focusing on actions that reduce zero-sum constraints.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Rather than seeking to counter every Chinese initiative, U.S. leaders should carefully distinguish between beneficial and damaging outcomes, affirming and building on China’s constructive proposals and managing differences through negotiation rather than polemics and confrontation."
  2. "Working with China to revitalize the international order would not only prevent such a conflict, it would also establish the conditions for healthy forms of both competition and cooperation in the U.S.–China relationship."

What They Discuss:

  • The report examines the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, highlighting the potential for cooperation in areas like climate change, development in the Global South, and reforming international institutions.
  • It emphasizes the need for the U.S. to carefully navigate its approach to China, distinguishing between actions that are beneficial or damaging to global stability.
  • The concept of "Common Good Diplomacy" is proposed as a means to manage differences and build on constructive proposals from both sides.
  • The report critiques the current U.S. approach of countering every Chinese initiative, advocating for a more nuanced strategy.
  • It also addresses the challenges and opportunities in areas like global authority and security, the global economy, and climate change.

What They Recommend:

  • Adopting a diplomatic approach that focuses on building an inclusive global system and reducing zero-sum constraints.
  • Engaging in cooperative efforts with China in areas like climate change, global economic guidelines, and international order reform.
  • Differentiating between Chinese actions that exacerbate tensions and those that contribute to global stability.
  • Pursuing a balanced approach that allows for competition within a rules-based order, avoiding destructive conflict.

Key Takeaways:

  • The report advocates for a strategic approach to U.S.-China relations that balances competition with cooperation.
  • It highlights the importance of recognizing shared interests in a stable global order and the potential for mutually beneficial reforms.
  • The concept of "Common Good Diplomacy" is presented as a framework for stable and constructive U.S.-China relations.

This is a brief overview of Jake Werner's report from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full report.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Every think tank. One newsletter.

Your new weekly briefing - curated from America’s top think tanks on Substack.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Video
Libertarian
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
No Result Found
We did not find any results for your search.

Your Think Tank Sidecar

Save and curate your own Readlists, create your own Dashboards, and more.
Got it