January 13, 2024
Ukraine’s Desperate Hour: The World Needs a Russian Defeat
Thinktanker Summary
AI-assisted summary reviewed by Thinktanker. While reasonable care is taken, errors may occur. Refer to the original source text for full accuracy.
  • AEI expert Hal Brands writes that the war in Ukraine is a critical test of democratic resilience against authoritarian forces.
  • The outcome of this conflict could either reinforce or erode the current global order, depending on the sustained commitment of democratic nations.
AI-assisted summary reviewed by Thinktanker. While reasonable care is taken, errors may occur. Refer to the original source text for full accuracy.

Overview:

  • This op-ed from American Enterprise Institute scholar Hal Brands examines the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly focusing on the global implications and the evolving dynamics of the war.
  • The initial Western response to Russia's invasion appeared strong, but the long-term effectiveness of these measures is now uncertain.
  • The war's outcome could significantly influence global power dynamics, especially regarding democratic resilience against authoritarian expansion.

Key Quotes:

  1. "In the hopeful early months of the war — characterized by Ukrainian resilience, Russian incompetence and Western unity — it often seemed that the conflict was revealing the strength of the free world and the debility of its enemies."
  2. "If the US and its allies can find the fortitude and commitment to see Ukraine through to an acceptable outcome... the conflict might still have mostly constructive consequences."

What They Discuss:

  • The initial success of Western strategies against Russia's invasion, including sanctions and military support to Ukraine.
  • The resilience of the Russian economy despite sanctions, with trade rerouting to Asia and strengthened ties with China.
  • The potential for Russia to emerge as a more formidable, illiberal power post-war.
  • Challenges within the democratic community, including political dysfunction in the US and "Ukraine fatigue" in the West.
  • The uncertain future of the conflict and its implications for global order, particularly if democratic nations fail to maintain support for Ukraine.

What They Recommend:

  • The article suggests the need for sustained Western commitment and support to ensure Ukraine's economic viability and military defense.
  • It emphasizes the importance of increasing the costs for Russia's aggression to maintain global order.

Key Takeaways:

  • The war in Ukraine is a critical test of democratic resilience against authoritarian forces.
  • The outcome of this conflict could either reinforce or erode the current global order, depending on the sustained commitment of democratic nations.
  • The situation remains fluid, and the long-term implications are still uncertain.

This is a brief overview of the work from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Every think tank. One newsletter.

Your new weekly briefing - curated from America’s top think tanks on Substack.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Video
Libertarian
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
No Result Found
We did not find any results for your search.

Your Think Tank Sidecar

Save and curate your own Readlists, create your own Dashboards, and more.
Got it