Center for American Progress
·
Published
August 3, 2020

The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits

Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Maggie Jo Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • Implementing an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices could help better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.

Overview:

This article, written by Maggie Jo Buchanan, addresses the need for implementing term limits for U.S. Supreme Court Justices to reflect modern societal changes.

  • Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • The article suggests that term limits could help the Supreme Court better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "The average justice’s term is now longer than it has been at any other point in U.S. history."
  2. "Regular appointments, however, would hopefully make the confirmation process less political."

What They Discuss:

  •  The average age of Supreme Court justices has remained static, but their terms have lengthened due to increased life expectancy.
  • Longer terms have led to justices having more power and influence over American life, more so than other branches of government.
  • The political nature of the confirmation process has intensified, with Senate leaders and presidents incentivized to secure ideologically aligned justices.
  • Proposals for term limits, such as an 18-year nonrenewable limit, are gaining momentum and support from various legal academics and justices.
  • Term limits could ensure more regular turnover, making the court more reflective of the public and less influenced by political agendas.

What They Recommend:

  • Implement an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices.
  • Ensure a more regular appointment process to reflect the broader public and reduce political tensions.
  • Allow justices to continue working in a senior status after their term ends, maintaining their contributions to the judiciary.
  • Consider statutory limits for term limits, either retrospectively or prospectively.

Key Takeaways:

  • The article emphasizes the need for Supreme Court term limits to address the challenges posed by longer tenures and increased politicization.
  • It argues that term limits would bring a healthier turnover and alignment with public sentiment, enhancing the court's legitimacy.
  • The recommendations aim to balance the need for experienced justices with the benefits of regular new appointments.​

This is a brief overview of Maggie Jo Buchanan's work from the Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Centrist
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Someone Has to Lead
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Someone Has to Lead

Summary
  • The U.S. must keep leading the world in promoting global human rights, despite its flawed human rights record and internal struggles.
  • Progress on freedom in the world requires U.S. leadership, otherwise Russia, China, and other autocratic states will continue democratic backsliding around the world.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook

Summary

The U.S.-China relationship currently faces significant rivalry that impacts collaboration, yet history shows that even rivals can work together on shared challenges. Understanding and advancing methods for cooperation among nonstate actors will be critical for addressing major global issues, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Issue Brief
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Gaza’s Human Crisis Demands a Rethink
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Gaza’s Human Crisis Demands a Rethink

Summary
  • CSIS Global Health Policy experts write that the Biden administration must reset its strategy to manage Israel's conduct in the conflict, which has caused an "apocalyptic" humanitarian crisis and global reputational damage.
  • Gaza's entire health system has been destroyed, with UN agencies and NGOs struggling to provide minimum medical aid to Gazan refugees.
Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can Maduro Pull off the Mother of All Electoral Frauds?

Summary
  • Ryan C. Berg and Christopher Hernandez-Roy at Center for Strategic and International Studies analyze that Venezuela's recent elections showcased a blatant electoral theft by President Maduro, who manipulated election conditions, barred opposition candidates, and used repression to secure a disputed victory over Edmundo González.

  • The article asserts that the Maduro regime’s fraudulent actions, including blocking international observations and harassing opposition supporters, risk severe international isolation and a possible constitutional crisis if vote tabulations are not transparently released, undermining any claims to democratic legitimacy.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.