.avif)
President Trump's questioning of the birthright citizenship clause is based on a historical interpretation of the 14th Amendment. This perspective suggests that citizenship was never intended for all individuals born in the U.S. without consideration of parental status, per commentary from Heritage Foundation.
President Trump's questioning of the birthright citizenship clause is based on a historical interpretation of the 14th Amendment. This perspective suggests that citizenship was never intended for all individuals born in the U.S. without consideration of parental status, per commentary from Heritage Foundation.
The issue:
The core challenge revolves around the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which states that only those born "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. are citizens. Historical context indicates that the amendment was designed to eliminate race-based citizenship barriers rather than to guarantee citizenship for all born in the U.S.
Go deeper:
Legislative history underscores that children born to non-citizens owe allegiance to their parents' home countries, thereby precluding automatic U.S. citizenship. Iconic court cases like Elk v. Wilkins (1884) reinforce the view that the Supreme Court has historically limited the scope of birthright citizenship. The president's order seeks to realign federal policy to adhere to this original intent of the 14th Amendment.
This is a brief overview of a commentary from Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.
Related
President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.
- Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.
The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.
Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?
Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
