Cato Institute
·
Published
July 9, 2024

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.

Overview:

This article was written by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute.

  • Key insights provided include the assertion that cosmopolitan support for globalization can coexist with opposition to a global government and that world government could potentially lead to substantial negative outcomes including authoritarianism.

Key Quotes:

  • "World government would be dangerous because people harmed by its policies could not 'vote with their feet' against it."
  • “We don’t need world government to solve the world’s problems.”

What They Discuss:

  • The debate over world government versus global governance, typically conflicted between cosmopolitan supporters and nationalist opponents.
  • World government could undermine diversity and beneficial competition among nation-states, as illustrated by the proposed global minimum tax by the OECD.
  • Political ignorance would be exacerbated under a global government, making it harder for voters to be well-informed about global policies.
  • A world government could make it impossible for individuals to migrate away from oppressive regimes, eliminating opportunities for “foot voting.”
  • Historical and hypothetical risks of world government turning into totalitarian regimes, potentially with catastrophic results.

What They Recommend:

  • Address global problems through cooperation between a few major powers rather than establishing a world government.
  • Utilize voluntary agreements and unilateral actions to solve international issues.
  • Promote migration rights and reduce barriers to immigration without the global government framework.
  • Stay cautious of empowering institutions of global governance that may pave the way to a world state.

Key Takeaways:

  • Even proponents of globalization can reasonably oppose the concept of world government due to the potential risks it poses.
  • Risks include loss of migration opportunities, stifling diversity and competition, exacerbating political ignorance, and potential for totalitarianism.
  • Many global challenges can be addressed effectively through international cooperation without centralized world governance.
  • Safeguarding against the dangers of world government requires critical analysis and careful measures to ensure local autonomy and effective global collaboration.

Disclaimer: 

This is a brief overview of the article by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Helping Ukraine Is Forcing the United States to Produce More Weapons
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Helping Ukraine Is Forcing the United States to Produce More Weapons

Summary
  • The U.S. is increasing its production of artillery rounds, with plans to produce more than 80,000 rounds per month next year and potentially 100,000 shells per month by 2025.
  • Supporting Ukraine is pushing the American defense industrial base to produce high quantities of weapons in a short amount of time across various states.
Conservative
Policy Brief
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Summary

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Need for Supreme Court Term Limits

Summary
  • Maggie Jo Buchanan points out that the average tenure of Supreme Court justices has significantly increased, leading to a lack of regularity in vacancies and a more politically charged confirmation process.
  • Implementing an 18-year nonrenewable term limit for Supreme Court justices could help better reflect the broader public and reduce the politicization of the court.
Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Summary
  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Israel-Hamas Conflict: 5 Actions Washington Should Prioritize Now
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Israel-Hamas Conflict: 5 Actions Washington Should Prioritize Now

Summary
  • The U.S. should prioritize negotiating a humanitarian ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict and ensure robust humanitarian aid to Gaza, while supporting Israel's defense needs without contributing to collective punishment against Palestinians.
  • It's important for the U.S. to enforce policies on civilian protection and human rights in the conflict, and to lead diplomatic efforts for a political solution that fosters lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Progressive
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.