Brookings
·
Published
July 11, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.

Overview:  

This article was written by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings.

  • Delegates in modern conventions are often seen as symbolic, yet historical and current contexts reveal their potential power.
  • Rule changes and debates over delegate binding and conscience clauses have shaped presidential nominations.

Key Quotes:  

  • “Because the victor at most modern conventions has been a foregone conclusion, the notion of delegates as the final decision-makers in a long nomination process has been lost—but, under certain circumstances, perhaps this one, they may still have the final word.”
  • “Delegates elected to the national convention pledged to a presidential candidate shall in all good conscience reflect the sentiments of those who elected them.”

What They Discuss:  

  • Between 1831 and 1972, U.S. presidential candidates were nominated by conventions composed of elected officials and party leaders, with primaries playing a minimal, non-binding role.
  • The 1968 Democratic convention, amidst anti-Vietnam War protests, led to reforms that required delegates to reflect voter preferences and transitioned towards primaries.
  • The Democratic "robot rule" (Rule 11(H)) in 1980 mandated that delegates vote for the candidate they were elected to support. Senator Kennedy's challenge to this rule demonstrated the difficulties of altering delegate commitments.
  • In 2016, Republican delegates faced a similar "robot rule" (Rule 16) controversy, aiming to introduce a conscience clause to vote against Trump, which ultimately failed.
  • Currently, the Democratic rule (Rule 13(J)) requires delegates to act "in all good conscience," a clause open to interpretation, which might become crucial if doubts about President Biden grow.

What They Recommend:  

  • Recognize the potential for delegate roles to shift under unusual circumstances, reflecting broader party concerns.
  • Monitor the application and interpretation of the "in all good conscience" clause in future conventions, especially given potential challenges to candidacies.

  

Key Takeaways:  

  • Historical shifts have transformed the role of delegates from decision-makers to more symbolic participants.
  • Despite reforms aimed at binding delegates to voter preferences, rules allowing for delegate discretion under specific conditions remain significant.
  • Present circumstances, such as doubts about a candidate's viability, can amplify the importance of these rules and the role of delegates.

This is a brief overview of the article by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
“Government Efficiency,” You Say? AEI Scholars Have Ideas
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

“Government Efficiency,” You Say? AEI Scholars Have Ideas

Summary
  • James Pethokoukis at American Enterprise Institute writes that the newly announced Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, will act as an external consulting group to the Trump White House, aiming to provide recommendations to streamline government operations by July 4, 2026.

  • The commentary argues that Washington policymakers should examine actionable proposals for improving healthcare, Social Security, and tax reform. These policies emphasize market incentives, fiscal responsibility, and economic growth, as discussed in the AEI report "A Balanced Plan for Fiscal Stability and Economic Growth."
Conservative
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump gained some minority voters, but the GOP is hardly a multiracial coalition
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump gained some minority voters, but the GOP is hardly a multiracial coalition

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings writes that despite claims of a multiracial transformation, Trump's support remains predominantly among white voters, with only modest gains among Latino or Hispanic voters and minimal shifts among Black voters.
  • The analysis asserts that the long-standing racial voting divide persists, with Democrats retaining significant support from Black and Latino or Hispanic voters, questioning any significant transformation of the GOP voter base.
Leans Left
Research
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
In Tied Presidential Race, Harris and Trump Have Contrasting Strengths, Weaknesses
Pew Research Center
·
Nov 18, 2023

In Tied Presidential Race, Harris and Trump Have Contrasting Strengths, Weaknesses

Summary
  • Pew Research Center report shows that the presidential race between Harris and Trump is currently deadlocked, with each candidate receiving 49% support among registered voters. Voters regard Trump as stronger on the economy while Harris is preferred on abortion and personal traits like honesty.
  • The survey asserts that voters are divided on Trump’s actions related to the 2020 election and his age. Additionally, Harris would make history if elected, being the first woman, Asian American, and Black woman president, while Trump would become the oldest person to assume office at 78.
Nonpartisan
Report
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump has big plans for climate and energy policy, but can he implement them?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump has big plans for climate and energy policy, but can he implement them?

Summary
  • Samantha Gross and Louison Sall at Brookings argue that Donald Trump advocates for a shift in U.S. energy policy, focusing on fossil fuels, reducing regulations, and opposing renewable energy initiatives to lower energy costs and achieve "energy dominance."
  • The article asserts that Trump's ability to implement his energy agenda depends on Congress and the courts, with recent Supreme Court decisions potentially aiding his deregulatory efforts in a second term.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Bring Back Trump’s China Policy
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy

Summary
  • Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
  • The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.
Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.