Cato Institute
·
Published
December 12, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • The Biden administration's latest request for $61 billion for Ukraine would bring the total U.S. support since 2022 to nearly $200 billion.
  • The authors question the feasibility of a Ukrainian victory and the U.S.'s ability to sustain financial support given its fiscal challenges.|

Overview:

This commentary piece by Justin Logan and Dan Caldwell at the Cato Institute critiques President Biden's approach to supporting Ukraine, arguing that the United States has overextended its resources. They assert that the Biden administration's request for additional funding for Ukraine is unsustainable given the U.S.'s fiscal position and the uncertain prospects of a Ukrainian victory.

Key Points:

  1. The Biden administration's latest request for $61 billion for Ukraine would bring the total U.S. support since 2022 to nearly $200 billion.
  2. The authors question the feasibility of a Ukrainian victory and the U.S.'s ability to sustain financial support given its fiscal challenges.|

Key Quotes:

  1. "The Biden administration continues to publicly advance the delusion that Ukraine can achieve a total and decisive victory against Russia."
  2. "Interest on the debt is now roughly $1 trillion per year, the national debt itself is at almost $34 trillion, and the budget deficit each year is some $1.5 trillion and expected to jump to almost $3 trillion by 2033."

What They Discuss:

  • The impact of U.S. support for Ukraine on the country's ammunition stockpiles and its ability to support other allies.
  • The challenges in achieving a meaningful Ukrainian breakthrough against Russia in the near term.
  • The risks of escalating the conflict in Ukraine and the high rates of munition expenditure.
  • The dire U.S. fiscal position, including a growing national debt and budget deficit, which makes continued support for Ukraine unsustainable.

What They Recommend:

  • Congress should reject the latest funding request for Ukraine due to the lack of a clear plan for victory and the U.S.'s precarious fiscal position.
  • The U.S. should reconsider its approach to the conflict in Ukraine, focusing on diplomatic solutions rather than continued military support.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The commentary highlights the fiscal and strategic challenges of the U.S.'s continued support for Ukraine.
  • It emphasizes the need for a reassessment of U.S. foreign policy priorities and fiscal responsibilities.
  • The authors argue for a more cautious approach to international conflicts, considering the U.S.'s domestic fiscal challenges.​

This is a brief overview of the commentary from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

Summary
  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.
Progressive
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings argues that Vice President Kamala Harris's nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate has invigorated the race, with a particular impact on female voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

  • The analysis reviews that women's votes were crucial in recent elections, highlighting how post-Roe v. Wade changes and Harris’s advocacy on women's issues could lead to a significant voting surge, potentially favoring her in the 2024 election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

Summary
  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

Summary
  • Adam N. Michel at Cato Institute argues that tax policy's prominence in the presidential campaign is due to the impending expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the candidates' proposals for new special-interest tax breaks that complicate and increase the tax code's complexity.
  • The report asserts that while there is bipartisan support for extending most of the expiring tax cuts, proposed targeted benefits for tips, families, homeowners, domestic production, and seniors will further complicate the tax system and pose significant fiscal challenges.
Libertarian
Policy Analysis
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal
Urban Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal

Summary
  • Urban Institute experts write that the Biden administration's rent stabilization proposal aims to cap annual rent increases at 5% for units owned by large landlords, conditioned on maintaining existing tax breaks, aiming to stabilize housing and protect tenants from eviction or displacement.
  • The experts argue that while the proposal could make more units affordable for low-income residents, it may also reduce the overall supply of rental units as landlords might convert properties or avoid entering the market, potentially driving up rents for uncontrolled units.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.