January 14, 2024

Cut the government with a scalpel, not an axe

Thinktanker Summary

Cutting federal government spending under the Trump administration may harm essential public services, creating significant backlash from citizens. Disruption caused by deep cuts could lead to political repercussions, complicating the government's efficiency goals, per commentary from Brookings.

Cutting federal government spending under the Trump administration may harm essential public services, creating significant backlash from citizens. Disruption caused by deep cuts could lead to political repercussions, complicating the government's efficiency goals, per commentary from Brookings.

The issue:  

The federal government’s primary challenge lies in reducing spending without jeopardizing essential services that Americans rely on, such as Social Security and Medicare. Mandatory spending accounts for 66% of the 2022 budget, leaving limited room for cuts in discretionary spending.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

Expert analysis suggests that a drastic reduction in the federal workforce, such as an 80% cut, would severely impair essential services like air traffic control and border security. Historical examples, such as the National Performance Review, highlight the importance of targeted reforms rather than sweeping cuts. Leveraging modern technology and a thorough agency-by-agency review could yield better outcomes without compromising public safety or services.  

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Washington DC
Founded 1916
An influential Washington-based think tank focusing on global security, defense, and economic policy.
Liberal
Leans Right
Create your own think tank.
Get the insights shaping policy and power every week.
Join us on Substack + Linkedin.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Video
Libertarian