January 13, 2024

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Thinktanker Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The issue:  

The core challenge is Trump's transactional view of foreign alliances, where he demands that allies pay their fair share or risk U.S. support. For instance, Trump has stated that nations relying on U.S. defense without adequate financial contributions could face abandonment in crises.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

Trump's policies may create divisions within NATO and affect the dynamics in the Indo-Pacific region, leading to increased tensions among allies. His criteria for evaluating alliances involve trade surpluses and defense spending, categorizing partners into "Safe" and "Danger" zones. Allies not meeting his expectations may face scrutiny and reduced support.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Washington DC
Founded 1916
An influential Washington-based think tank focusing on global security, defense, and economic policy.
Liberal
Leans Right
Create your own think tank.
Get the insights shaping policy and power every week.
Join us on Substack + Linkedin.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Video
Libertarian