Cato Institute
·
Published
December 29, 2024

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Share this article

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

The issue:  

The core challenge lies in addressing the complex and resilient nature of drug cartels in Mexico, which continue to thrive despite previous military efforts. Proposals for U.S. military action overlook historical insights, where past interventions did not eliminate cartel influence and often worsened violence.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

Past military actions have shown that cartels adapt quickly, with violence often increasing despite tactical victories. Moreover, military incursions could severely damage U.S.-Mexico relations, which are crucial for joint efforts in managing migration and countering China’s growing influence. Understanding local dynamics and political support is essential for any proposed solution, highlighting the complexity of the issue.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops

Summary
  • President Biden's public statements on the drone attack that killed 3 U.S. soldiers in Jordan shows the U.S. is keen to avoid war with Iran while focusing on Hezbollah's activities.
  • The drone attack represents a significant escalation, marking the first US military casualty by enemy air power since 1953 and prompting a strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah from aggressive engagements with US forces in Iraq and Syria.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative
Migration Policy Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative

Summary
  • The Biden administration has taken a proactive approach to immigration with 535 immigration actions, surpassing the Trump administration in the number of executive actions.
  • The administration's immigration actions have led to legal immigration returning to and surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with refugee admissions on pace to reach the highs of the 1990s.
Leans Left
Report
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.