Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.
Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.
The issue:
The core challenge lies in addressing the complex and resilient nature of drug cartels in Mexico, which continue to thrive despite previous military efforts. Proposals for U.S. military action overlook historical insights, where past interventions did not eliminate cartel influence and often worsened violence.
What they recommend:
No recommendations provided in the commentary.
Go deeper:
Past military actions have shown that cartels adapt quickly, with violence often increasing despite tactical victories. Moreover, military incursions could severely damage U.S.-Mexico relations, which are crucial for joint efforts in managing migration and countering China’s growing influence. Understanding local dynamics and political support is essential for any proposed solution, highlighting the complexity of the issue.
This is a brief overview of a commentary from Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.
Related
President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.
- Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.
The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.
Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?
Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
