- Experts at Brookings argue that Kamala Harris has regained lost ground for the Democrats, erasing the "enthusiasm gap" and leading in both national and key swing state polls against Donald Trump.
- They examine the reliability of poll averages, highlighting historical underestimation of Trump’s support and the necessity for Harris to maintain significant momentum to secure victory.
Overview:
This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.
- Kamala Harris has gained substantial ground since replacing Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee, closing the enthusiasm gap and outperforming Trump on key personal attributes.
- Although Harris currently leads in many critical states, the election remains highly volatile, with polling inaccuracies and unpredictable events potentially influencing the final outcome.
Key Quotes:
- "In six extraordinary weeks since replacing Joe Biden as the Democratic presidential nominee, Kamala Harris has regained all the ground Biden lost between January and July—and more."
- "We should also be cautious about concluding that Harris now enjoys a clear lead over Trump. In recent elections, not just individual polls but also poll averages have turned out to be misleading."
What They Discuss:
- Averages of multiple polls are more reliable than individual polls, with RealClearPolitics and FiveThirtyEight offering different methodologies.
- Harris's lead in crucial "Blue Wall" states could provide her with the 270 electoral votes needed, but this is not guaranteed.
- Historical inaccuracy of polls, especially in estimating Trump's support, underscores the need for caution.
- Polling errors have been more pronounced in key swing states compared to other regions.
- Issues such as inflation may play a more significant role in voter preferences this election cycle, over issues like abortion.
What They Recommend:
- Be cautious about relying solely on current poll data, as past inaccuracies have shown.
- Consider multiple sources and types of polling data to get a more comprehensive view of the race.
- Stay alert for shifts in campaign dynamics, especially after significant events like debates.
Key Takeaways:
- Harris's early surge in support does not necessarily secure her victory due to the fluid nature of electoral politics.
- Polling errors, particularly underestimating Trump’s support, have been significant in past elections.
- Key issues and voter demographics today may not align perfectly with past election cycles.
- Election outcomes likely depend on a small number of votes in crucial swing states, making the race highly competitive and unpredictable.
This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.
Related
President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.
- Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.
The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.
Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?
Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
