Special Competitive Studies Project
·
Published
April 1, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • National strategy plan proposes "biotech moonshots", global biotech standards, and securing biotech platforms against rival nations, especially China.
  • The plan stresses treating genomic data as a strategic resource and highlights the potential of biotechnology to revolutionize sectors like health and agriculture.

Overview:

Authors: Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP)

Publishing Date: April 23, 2023

Publishing Organization: Special Competitive Studies Project|

Executive Summary:

The Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP) has released a comprehensive National Action Plan to establish U.S. leadership in biotechnology. This plan outlines strategic initiatives to harness biotechnology's transformative potential for national security, economy, society, and healthcare.

Background:

Biotechnology, a multi-trillion dollar sector, is pivotal in transforming industries like agriculture, health, industrials, materials, and energy. The U.S. currently leads in genetic engineering and molecular biology, but faces competition from countries like China. This plan is part of a broader effort by SCSP to enhance America's competitiveness in emerging technologies.

Issue Description:

The U.S. is at a critical juncture in securing its biotech future. Key challenges include maintaining global leadership, competing with nations like China, integrating biotech across various sectors, and managing the transition from lab breakthroughs to commercialization.

Policy Options:

  1. Investing in Biotech Moonshots: Focusing on projects like the Annotated Non-Human Genome Project and National Medshield.
  2. Strengthening Biotech Infrastructure: Enhancing domestic biomanufacturing capabilities and aligning the biotech standards ecosystem.
  3. Empowering Innovation Ecosystem: Establishing University Centers of Excellence and expanding biomanufacturing institutes.
  4. Building Global Bionet: Creating an early warning system for bio-related incidents.
  5. Developing Talent: Growing a skilled biotech workforce and attracting global talent.

Policy Recommendations:

  • R&D Investment: Significant investment in biotech research and development.
  • Public-Private Collaboration: Strengthening partnerships between government, academia, and industry.
  • Regulatory Framework: Updating regulations to foster innovation and competitiveness.
  • Global Leadership: Leading global efforts in setting biotech standards and ethics.
  • Security Protocols: Implementing stringent security measures to safeguard biotech advancements.

Conclusion:

The National Action Plan for U.S. Leadership in Biotechnology is a strategic blueprint for securing America's biotech future. It emphasizes the need for substantial investment, innovative policy-making, and global collaboration. Success in these endeavors will ensure U.S. leadership in biotechnology, benefiting national security, economic growth, and global health.

This policy brief is a high-level summary and does not encompass all the details of the comprehensive plan. For a full understanding, it is recommended to review the entire National Action Plan document.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative
Migration Policy Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative

Summary
  • The Biden administration has taken a proactive approach to immigration with 535 immigration actions, surpassing the Trump administration in the number of executive actions.
  • The administration's immigration actions have led to legal immigration returning to and surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with refugee admissions on pace to reach the highs of the 1990s.
Leans Left
Report
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?

Summary
  • Recent developments, particularly Russia's involvement in Ukraine and its reliance on Iran, have strained its relations with Israel, marking a departure from the previously improving ties under Putin's leadership.
  • Russia's strategic positioning in the Middle East, balancing relationships with Israel, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, aiming to be a central player capable of engaging with all sides.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics

Summary
  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How President Biden is appeasing bad actors
Texas Public Policy Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

How President Biden is appeasing bad actors

Summary
  • The Biden administration's appeasement of authoritarian regimes in South America have not stopped the outflow of refugees and migrants trying to enter the U.S.
  • Lifting previous oil & gas sanctions on the Maduro regime in exchange for free elections have not worked, with Venezuelans now the fastest-growing immigrant group in the U.S.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Summary
  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.