Summary

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) warns that the formula used by the White House drastically overstates the trade barriers imposed by foreign countries — and risks harming the U.S. economy.

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) warns that the formula used by the White House drastically overstates the trade barriers imposed by foreign countries — and risks harming the U.S. economy.

The issue:

 The Trump administration’s “reciprocal” tariff formula calculates foreign tariffs based on the U.S. trade deficit — not on actual policy. AEI says this leads to exaggerated numbers, because the formula mistakenly uses retail price data instead of import price data. That misstep inflates estimated foreign tariffs by 400%, resulting in U.S. tariffs as high as 50% — even in cases where trade barriers are low or non-existent.

What they recommend:

 AEI calls for a correction to the formula. Doing so would reduce most tariffs to the 10% minimum floor, ease global trade tensions, and lower the risk of recession — all without abandoning the administration’s stated goals.

Go deeper:

 AEI emphasizes that trade deficits are shaped by many factors, including international capital flows and supply chains, not just tariffs. And even if the formula had merit (which AEI disputes), it was applied incorrectly. Fixing this basic error could offer quick relief to U.S. businesses and consumers while restoring credibility to trade policy.

This is a brief overview of a post from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?

Summary

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China

Summary

Trump's threatened tariffs could lead to significant economic harm for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. These tariffs, if implemented, threaten to slow economic growth and increase inflation across all involved nations, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Commentary
·
Global Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
8 Ways Special Interests Are Asking President-Elect Trump To Sell Out U.S. Public Lands
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

8 Ways Special Interests Are Asking President-Elect Trump To Sell Out U.S. Public Lands

Summary

Per commentary from Center for American Progress, President-elect Trump faces pressure from corporate lobbyists to prioritize special interests at the expense of public lands. The proposed actions threaten the environmental protections that Trump previously disavowed during his campaign.  

Progressive
Report
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.