January 13, 2024

Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit

Thinktanker Summary
  • Robert Benson at Center for American Progress writes that the 75th NATO Summit underscored the urgency of paving a clear membership path for Ukraine and strengthening Eastern Europe's defenses against Russian aggression, marking vital steps for the alliance's future.
  • The column asserts that Washington must ensure all NATO members meet their defense spending commitments and enhance cybersecurity to tackle sophisticated threats, while also expanding NATO’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s growing military assertiveness.

Overview:

This article was written by Robert Benson at Center for American Progress.

  • The 75th NATO Summit served as a pivotal moment for addressing modern security challenges and shaping NATO's future.
  • The rapidly evolving global security landscape necessitates strategic actions from Washington to fortify NATO's defenses and international engagements.

Key Quotes:

  • “Perhaps at no point since its founding in 1949, and certainly not since the end of the Cold War, has NATO been so comprehensively tested.”
  • “Given the rapidly devolving global security landscape in Europe and the Middle East, along with rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific basin, it is imperative for Washington to build on key summit outcomes.”

What They Discuss:

  • NATO should clearly invite Ukraine to join and provide a concrete timeline for its accession, simplifying the membership process by removing the requirement for a Membership Action Plan.
  • Reinforcing Eastern Europe’s defenses is critical given Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, which includes expanding NATO battlegroups and enhancing infrastructure.
  • Despite Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg’s announcement, only 23 out of 32 members are meeting defense spending commitments, indicating a need for increased burden-sharing.
  • Increasing NATO’s presence in the Indo-Pacific, particularly through partnerships with regional players and forums, is essential to counter China's assertiveness.
  • Advancing NATO’s technological capabilities and cybersecurity defenses is necessary to adapt to modern asymmetric threats.

What They Recommend:

  • Establish specific benchmarks and integrate Ukraine into NATO's command and control structure through phased steps like joint military exercises.
  • Expand NATO forces and integrate air and missile defense systems in Eastern Europe to protect against Russian threats.
  • Encourage all NATO members to meet their defense spending commitments and consider common defense bonds to support mutual security.
  • Enhance NATO’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific by opening liaison offices and improving cooperation with regional partners.
  • Invest in cutting-edge technologies and a comprehensive cyber defense strategy, involving collaboration with the private sector and adherence to ethical AI governance.

Key Takeaways:

  • The 75th NATO Summit underscores the need for clear strategies and commitments to enhance security in an increasingly complex global landscape.
  • Ensuring a well-defined path for Ukraine’s membership and strengthening Eastern Europe’s defenses are top priorities.
  • Increased defense spending and burden-sharing by all members are crucial to maintaining NATO’s operational readiness.
  • Engaging in the Indo-Pacific region is vital for global stability and countering threats from China.
  • Modernizing NATO’s technological and cyber defenses is essential to maintaining its strategic edge against asymmetric threats.

This is a brief overview of the article by Robert Benson at Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Washington DC
Founded 1916
An influential Washington-based think tank focusing on global security, defense, and economic policy.
Liberal
Leans Right
View
Create your own think tank.
Get the insights shaping policy and power every week.
Join us on Substack + Linkedin.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Video
Libertarian