January 13, 2024

Students Are Not the Biggest Problem When It Comes to Speech

Thinktanker Summary
  • Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • Abrams argues students widely support the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.

Overview:

This article by Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing that students are not the primary problem when it comes to restrictions on speech.

  • Abrams emphasizes that the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • The article highlights that most students value free speech and are open to diverse viewpoints.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is the college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices that hinder the classical liberal education experience."
  2. "About 61 percent of students often feel intimidated to share their ideas, opinions, or beliefs in class because they are different than those of their professors."​

What They Discuss:

  • The decline of viewpoint diversity and open debate in colleges, leading to ideological monoculture.
  • The misconception that student mobs are the main cause of speech limitations, while the role of college administrators is more significant.
  • Data from the Buckley Institute showing that a majority of students value free speech but feel pressured to self-censor.
  • The support among students for the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.
  • The need to educate students on the value of free speech and diverse opinions for a better education and future leadership.

What They Recommend:

  • Supporting students' desire to learn and question, rather than focusing on a minority that seeks to limit liberal education.
  • Promoting the fact that most students understand the importance of listening to different opinions for a liberal education.
  • Encouraging students to be key players in pushing back against the impulse to silence debate.
  • Backing students in their learning and not blaming them for the problems of expression on campus.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The article challenges the narrative that students are the main impediment to free speech on campuses.
  • It highlights the need to address the role of college administrators in creating a restrictive environment.
  • The article underscores the importance of fostering an educational culture that values open debate and diverse viewpoints.

This is a brief overview of Samuel J. Abrams' article from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

THINK TANK PROFILE

Washington DC
Founded 1916
An influential Washington-based think tank focusing on global security, defense, and economic policy.
Liberal
Leans Right
Create your own think tank.
Get the insights shaping policy and power every week.
Join us on Substack + Linkedin.

Related

Center for Strategic International Studies

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Commentary
Leans Left
RAND Corporation

AEI experts explore the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan is important, but it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.

Will Support for Israel Cost Biden Michigan?

Commentary
Conservative
Cato Institute

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Video
Libertarian