Brookings
·
Published
July 16, 2024

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.

Overview:

This article was written by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings.

  • Donald Trump's selection of Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate emphasizes the reinforcing model over the traditional balancing model for vice-presidential picks.
  • The reinforcing model has evolved the role of vice presidents into more influential and integral parts of the administration, in contrast to the historically ceremonial and sidelined roles.

Key Quotes:

  • "What Trump did in choosing Vance was to choose a younger, more handsome, and more articulate version of himself—he was reinforcing his message."
  • "Trump has made an effective choice in Senator Vance. Vance will not only reinforce Trump’s core messages, but also he will be trustworthy as a vice president."

What They Discuss:

  • Vice-presidential selections historically balanced geographic and ideological differences, such as John F. Kennedy choosing Lyndon B. Johnson.
  • The modern reinforcing model prioritizes message consistency, as seen with Bill Clinton's selection of Al Gore.
  • Trump's selection of J.D. Vance aligns with his strategy to maintain and amplify his core messages.
  • The reinforcing model became popular due to its advantages in both campaigning and governance, reducing intra-administration conflicts.
  • Vance, a steadfast supporter of Trump, echoes core Trump base sentiments on issues like the 2020 election and Capitol attack prisoners, ensuring alignment with Trump's policies.

What They Recommend:

  • The article suggests that future presidential candidates should consider the reinforcing model for vice-presidential selections to ensure cohesive administration policies and effective governance.
  • It implies that aligning vice-presidents with the presidential agenda could prevent internal conflicts, thus better serving the electoral and governance needs.

Key Takeaways:

  • The reinforcing model has proven effective in recent decades by ensuring vice presidents align closely with the president’s agenda.
  • J.D. Vance's alignment with Trump’s positions strengthens Trump's political messaging, particularly significant given Trump's age.
  • The shift from balancing to reinforcing vice-presidential picks marks a significant change in political strategy and governance.

This is a brief overview of the article by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Gender Wars Are an Early Warning Sign for Authoritarianism
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Gender Wars Are an Early Warning Sign for Authoritarianism

Summary

Gender wars highlight the rise of authoritarianism globally, as seen in Georgia's struggle for democracy against Russian influence. Women leaders across various nations are pivotal in resisting these trends, emphasizing their essential role in safeguarding freedoms and rights, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

Center
Commentary
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Can the world trading system survive Donald Trump?
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Can the world trading system survive Donald Trump?

Summary

The world trading system faces significant challenges due to proposed tariffs by the U.S. president, notably a 60% tariff on China. These actions threaten to disrupt global trade and create tensions among member nations, as they debate their responses to this situation, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics. 

Center
Speech
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How to Succeed in Deterring an Invasion of Taiwan Without Really Trying (Hard)
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

How to Succeed in Deterring an Invasion of Taiwan Without Really Trying (Hard)

Summary

The potential for a Chinese invasion of Taiwan poses a significant challenge to U.S. national security. A successful invasion would not only oppress the Taiwanese people but also expand China's influence across East Asia, threatening regional stability, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

Center
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Syria’s challenges are even greater than those Libya faced in 2011
Chatham House
·
Nov 18, 2023

Syria’s challenges are even greater than those Libya faced in 2011

Summary

Syria faces more daunting challenges than Libya did in 2011, highlighted by deep social divisions, a devastated infrastructure, and a complex geopolitical landscape. The situation calls for cautious optimism as Syrians navigate a new political reality following the fall of the Assad regime, per commentary from Chatham House.

Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change

Summary

The fires in Los Angeles highlight the urgent security threat posed by climate change, which is reshaping national security paradigms. This disconnect limits the government's response to climate disasters, putting public trust and political stability at risk, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.