Brookings
·
Published
July 16, 2024

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.

Overview:

This article was written by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings.

  • Donald Trump's selection of Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate emphasizes the reinforcing model over the traditional balancing model for vice-presidential picks.
  • The reinforcing model has evolved the role of vice presidents into more influential and integral parts of the administration, in contrast to the historically ceremonial and sidelined roles.

Key Quotes:

  • "What Trump did in choosing Vance was to choose a younger, more handsome, and more articulate version of himself—he was reinforcing his message."
  • "Trump has made an effective choice in Senator Vance. Vance will not only reinforce Trump’s core messages, but also he will be trustworthy as a vice president."

What They Discuss:

  • Vice-presidential selections historically balanced geographic and ideological differences, such as John F. Kennedy choosing Lyndon B. Johnson.
  • The modern reinforcing model prioritizes message consistency, as seen with Bill Clinton's selection of Al Gore.
  • Trump's selection of J.D. Vance aligns with his strategy to maintain and amplify his core messages.
  • The reinforcing model became popular due to its advantages in both campaigning and governance, reducing intra-administration conflicts.
  • Vance, a steadfast supporter of Trump, echoes core Trump base sentiments on issues like the 2020 election and Capitol attack prisoners, ensuring alignment with Trump's policies.

What They Recommend:

  • The article suggests that future presidential candidates should consider the reinforcing model for vice-presidential selections to ensure cohesive administration policies and effective governance.
  • It implies that aligning vice-presidents with the presidential agenda could prevent internal conflicts, thus better serving the electoral and governance needs.

Key Takeaways:

  • The reinforcing model has proven effective in recent decades by ensuring vice presidents align closely with the president’s agenda.
  • J.D. Vance's alignment with Trump’s positions strengthens Trump's political messaging, particularly significant given Trump's age.
  • The shift from balancing to reinforcing vice-presidential picks marks a significant change in political strategy and governance.

This is a brief overview of the article by Elaine Kamarck at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas

Summary
  • AEI expert Samuel J. Abrams argues that the silence or delayed response of college administrations in the face of Hamas's attacks is a moral failure and indicative of a broader issue of anti-Semitism on campuses.
  • Abrams writes that colleges and universities should swiftly condemn actions taken by Hamas against innocent Israelis, and administrators and presidents who fail to confront these issues should step down.
Conservative
Blog
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should America have trillionaires?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should America have trillionaires?

Summary
  • Brookings expert Darrell M. West highlights the growing income inequality in the U.S., where the top 10% of income earners now receive 48% of the country's total income.
  • "Left unchecked, extraordinary money can lead to preferential economic treatment, advantageous political access, and unfair policy benefits."
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Culture & Society
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Centrist
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Someone Has to Lead
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Someone Has to Lead

Summary
  • The U.S. must keep leading the world in promoting global human rights, despite its flawed human rights record and internal struggles.
  • Progress on freedom in the world requires U.S. leadership, otherwise Russia, China, and other autocratic states will continue democratic backsliding around the world.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough

Summary
  • Hudson scholar John P. Walters writes that the October 7 attacks in Israel by Hamas showcases the need for a more proactive approach to deterrence beyond passive defense strategies.
  • Walters criticizes U.S. policy towards Israel, suggesting it has encouraged a passive defense approach and hindered proactive deterrence.
Conservative
Report
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.