RAND Corporation
·
Published
January 9, 2025
Share this article

Summary

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

The issue:  

Many in the U.S. believe allies do not contribute fairly to global security costs, primarily due to a focus on the 2% GDP spending target. However, data shows that 23 of the 32 NATO members met this goal last year, reflecting significant progress over the past decade.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

The updated analysis reveals that the U.S. share of global security contributions has decreased from 53% post-Cold War to around 39% in 2023. Notably, Eastern European countries are among the top contributors due to security concerns from Russia. Moreover, using metrics beyond spending, such as capabilities, can inform more tailored support requests from allies.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Biden Has Massively Overdrawn America’s Account with Blank Checks to Ukraine
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden Has Massively Overdrawn America’s Account with Blank Checks to Ukraine

Summary
  • The Biden administration's latest request for $61 billion for Ukraine would bring the total U.S. support since 2022 to nearly $200 billion.
  • The authors question the feasibility of a Ukrainian victory and the U.S.'s ability to sustain financial support given its fiscal challenges.|
Libertarian
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discuss the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • He argues that these Israeli settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The implications of the AI boom for nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The implications of the AI boom for nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Generative AI tools could enhance disinformation, recruitment, and intelligence efforts by producing convincing fake content, as well as cybercrimes like extortion and cyber-espionage.
  • Predictive AI could be used to optimize weaponry and personnel deployment, reducing tactical advantages of state actors.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Common Good Diplomacy: A Framework for Stable U.S.–China Relations
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

Common Good Diplomacy: A Framework for Stable U.S.–China Relations

Summary
  • The report argues that both the U.S. and China, as status quo powers, share an interest in a stable global security environment and an open global economy.
  • It suggests that diplomacy should focus on framing an inclusive global system, focusing on actions that reduce zero-sum constraints.
Bipartisan
Issue Brief
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Emergency Arms Sale to Israel Undermines Accountability
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Emergency Arms Sale to Israel Undermines Accountability

Summary
  • The emergency arms sale to Israel undermines effective oversight of arms transfers and contradicts the Biden administration’s policies on civilian protection and human rights.
  • Congress should preserve oversight over weapons transfers and consider amendments requiring reporting on compliance with U.S. and international law and protection of civilians.
Progressive
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.