Cato Institute
·
Published
July 9, 2024

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.

Overview:

This article was written by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute.

  • Key insights provided include the assertion that cosmopolitan support for globalization can coexist with opposition to a global government and that world government could potentially lead to substantial negative outcomes including authoritarianism.

Key Quotes:

  • "World government would be dangerous because people harmed by its policies could not 'vote with their feet' against it."
  • “We don’t need world government to solve the world’s problems.”

What They Discuss:

  • The debate over world government versus global governance, typically conflicted between cosmopolitan supporters and nationalist opponents.
  • World government could undermine diversity and beneficial competition among nation-states, as illustrated by the proposed global minimum tax by the OECD.
  • Political ignorance would be exacerbated under a global government, making it harder for voters to be well-informed about global policies.
  • A world government could make it impossible for individuals to migrate away from oppressive regimes, eliminating opportunities for “foot voting.”
  • Historical and hypothetical risks of world government turning into totalitarian regimes, potentially with catastrophic results.

What They Recommend:

  • Address global problems through cooperation between a few major powers rather than establishing a world government.
  • Utilize voluntary agreements and unilateral actions to solve international issues.
  • Promote migration rights and reduce barriers to immigration without the global government framework.
  • Stay cautious of empowering institutions of global governance that may pave the way to a world state.

Key Takeaways:

  • Even proponents of globalization can reasonably oppose the concept of world government due to the potential risks it poses.
  • Risks include loss of migration opportunities, stifling diversity and competition, exacerbating political ignorance, and potential for totalitarianism.
  • Many global challenges can be addressed effectively through international cooperation without centralized world governance.
  • Safeguarding against the dangers of world government requires critical analysis and careful measures to ensure local autonomy and effective global collaboration.

Disclaimer: 

This is a brief overview of the article by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along

Summary
  • Carnegie Endowment expert Nikita Smagin writes that the Gaza conflict has reinforced Russia's belief in the correctness of its foreign policy approach, particularly in relation to the Western-centric international system.
  • Russia views the conflict as an opportunity to further its geopolitical interests, especially amidst the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Liberal
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power
Goldman Sachs Global Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power

Summary
  • Goldman Sachs Global Institute estimates AI could contribute 1.5% to annual productivity growth over a ten-year period, lifting global GDP by nearly $7 trillion.
  • U.S. and China are top AI competitors, but geopolitical swing states like India, Japan, Israel, UAE, and South Korea can form "innovation blocs" and cooperate with each other.
Private Sector
Research
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation

Summary
  • Hezbollah is a politically-powerful force within Lebanon, and now serves as Iran's equal partner and "most successful and lethal export".
  • While Hezbollah and Hamas are on opposite sides of the Shia-Sunni divide, both groups find common ground under Iranian support and being anti-Israeli, anti-American, and anti-Western.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing
Center for a New American Security
·
Nov 18, 2023

U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing

Summary
  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.
Center Left
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary
  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.