Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Published
January 10, 2025

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Share this article

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

The issue:  

Pentagon Spending and Ineffective Military Policy  

The American Enterprise Institute claims a Russian victory in Ukraine necessitates over $800 billion in additional Pentagon funding, despite the Defense Department's budget already exceeding $1 trillion annually. Historical evidence highlights that increased military spending has not only been ineffective but has also contributed to humanitarian crises and instability, costing over $8 trillion since 9/11.

What they recommend:  

Need for a New Approach  

Quincy Institute experts argue for a shift away from a purely military-centric foreign policy, advocating instead for strategies that prioritize peace and diplomacy. They urge a re-evaluation of military spending in light of historical failures and current geopolitical realities.

Go deeper:  

Consequences of Military-First Strategy  

The Costs of War Project shows that America's post-9/11 conflicts resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and thousands of veterans suffering from injuries, all while failing to achieve strategic objectives. The report points out that Russia's current military performance in Ukraine reveals significant flaws, indicating that increasing U.S. military spending would not effectively counter a weakened adversary. Moreover, it calls for European allies to enhance their military capabilities to reduce reliance on U.S. forces.

This is a brief overview of a policy analysis from Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full policy analysis.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
AI's Power Requirements Under Exponential Growth
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

AI's Power Requirements Under Exponential Growth

Summary

The exponential growth of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is driving unprecedented demands for power that could overwhelm existing infrastructure. If not addressed, U.S. companies may have to relocate AI operations overseas, jeopardizing national competitiveness and security, per commentary from RAND Corporation. 

Center
Report
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
“Government Efficiency,” You Say? AEI Scholars Have Ideas
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

“Government Efficiency,” You Say? AEI Scholars Have Ideas

Summary
  • James Pethokoukis at American Enterprise Institute writes that the newly announced Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, will act as an external consulting group to the Trump White House, aiming to provide recommendations to streamline government operations by July 4, 2026.

  • The commentary argues that Washington policymakers should examine actionable proposals for improving healthcare, Social Security, and tax reform. These policies emphasize market incentives, fiscal responsibility, and economic growth, as discussed in the AEI report "A Balanced Plan for Fiscal Stability and Economic Growth."
Conservative
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump gained some minority voters, but the GOP is hardly a multiracial coalition
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump gained some minority voters, but the GOP is hardly a multiracial coalition

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings writes that despite claims of a multiracial transformation, Trump's support remains predominantly among white voters, with only modest gains among Latino or Hispanic voters and minimal shifts among Black voters.
  • The analysis asserts that the long-standing racial voting divide persists, with Democrats retaining significant support from Black and Latino or Hispanic voters, questioning any significant transformation of the GOP voter base.
Leans Left
Research
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
In Tied Presidential Race, Harris and Trump Have Contrasting Strengths, Weaknesses
Pew Research Center
·
Nov 18, 2023

In Tied Presidential Race, Harris and Trump Have Contrasting Strengths, Weaknesses

Summary
  • Pew Research Center report shows that the presidential race between Harris and Trump is currently deadlocked, with each candidate receiving 49% support among registered voters. Voters regard Trump as stronger on the economy while Harris is preferred on abortion and personal traits like honesty.
  • The survey asserts that voters are divided on Trump’s actions related to the 2020 election and his age. Additionally, Harris would make history if elected, being the first woman, Asian American, and Black woman president, while Trump would become the oldest person to assume office at 78.
Nonpartisan
Report
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy

Summary
  • Brendan Duke at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 proposes a tax plan that raises taxes on low- and middle-income families while giving significant tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.
  • The analysis asserts that the introduction of a flat consumption tax and elimination of income taxes would result in higher costs for middle- and low-income households, shifting the tax burden away from wealthy individuals and large corporations.
Progressive
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.