2024 U.S. Elections

Overview:  

This article was written by Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings.

​

• North Carolina has become a swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics.
• The Democratic Party is focusing on mobilizing young voters and re-engaging rural communities as part of their 2024 strategy.

​

Key Quotes:

​

• “Then in 2008, Barack Obama, the first successful African American presidential candidate, eked out a victory that was widely attributed to very high African American turnout.”
• “As a result of his far-right views and inflammatory rhetoric, Robinson has struggled to garner support outside of his conservative evangelical base—alienating moderate voters and anti-Trump Republicans.”

​

What They Discuss:

​

• The Raleigh-Durham-Cary combined statistical area has seen a population increase of 5.6% since 2020, drawing people from heavily Democratic states.
• From 2011 to 2021, the largest increases in net migration to North Carolina came from Democratic strongholds such as California and New York.
• Nearly 90% of the 900,000+ people who moved to North Carolina between 2010 and 2020 are people of color, many likely to vote Democratic.
• The percentage of North Carolinians with at least a bachelor’s degree is rising, correlating with a Democratic voter increase.
• In 2022, Democrats left over 25% of state legislative races unchallenged, which strengthened the Republican stronghold in North Carolina.

​

What They Recommend:

​

• Encourage young people to register to vote and participate as volunteers to support the Democratic campaign.
• Contest every state legislative race to challenge the Republican majority and leverage “down-ballot” momentum.
• Address radical candidates like Mark Robinson to galvanize voter turnout against extremist views.

​

Key Takeaways:

​

• North Carolina’s swing state status is influenced by demographic changes and migration from Democratic states.
• The North Carolina Democratic Party’s strategy includes mobilizing young voters, re-engaging rural communities, and contesting all state legislative races.
• Down-ballot races can significantly impact top-of-the-ticket outcomes, similar to momentum seen in the 2020 Georgia Senate races.
• Far-right candidates like Mark Robinson may drive moderate and anti-Trump Republican voters to support Democratic candidates, including President Biden.

​

This is a brief overview of the article by Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Overview:

This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.

• The first presidential debate of 2024 has resulted in a noticeable shift in voter preferences, increasing former President Trump's lead by 2 percentage points.
• President Biden faces compounded challenges from previous issues that have negatively impacted his public standing, which were intensified by his debate performance.

​

Key Quotes:

• “Since 1976, the first debate of a presidential year has shifted voters’ preferences by an average of 2.4 percentage points during the two weeks following the debate, almost always against the incumbent president (or the incumbent’s party when the president is not running for reelection).”
• “In the past three presidential elections, the first debate has moved voters’ preferences by an average of 2.8 percentage points. And because we are closely as well as deeply divided, with elections decided by small margins, changes of this size can be decisive.”

​

What They Discuss:

• The 2 percentage point shift toward Trump is significant and has altered the dynamics between the candidates. Trump's lead grew from 1.5 points before the debate to 3.5 points afterward.
• Due to larger margins in Blue states, Democrats require a substantial lead in the popular vote to win the Electoral College. Biden's 4.5-point margin in 2020 was barely enough to secure victory.
• Post-debate, Biden's situation demands an improvement of at least 5 points in the popular vote to ensure an Electoral College win.
• The debate exacerbated existing problems for Biden, including doubts about his age and leadership capabilities, high prices, and immigration issues.
• Biden's inability to effectively defend his record has heightened concerns and has not stemmed the calls within his party for him to withdraw from the race.

​

What They Recommend:

• The article does not directly provide policy recommendations but highlights the necessity for Biden to address his weaknesses and public doubts.
• It implies an urgency for a strategic turnaround to regain voter confidence and secure his position in the race.

​

Key Takeaways:

• The first debate has significantly impacted voter preferences, favoring Trump by enhancing his lead.
• President Biden needs a considerable boost in the popular vote to win the Electoral College, compounded by existing public doubts and criticisms.
• The debate has only intensified the challenges facing Biden, putting additional pressure on his campaign to find effective solutions swiftly.

​

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Overview:

This commentary from Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls from U.S. voters on the Biden and Trump economies. Voters remain pessimistic about the economy, despite recent improvements to the U.S. economy. Inflation and high prices are top concerns among voters' assessment of the U.S. economy.

​

Key Quotes:

• "President Biden continues to get low marks for his handling of inflation. Overall, only 35% of voters approve of his handling of this issue. Among Hispanics, just 34% approve; for young adults, 28%; among lower-income voters, 29%."
• "These recent polls are a snapshot, not a forecast. Much can change between now and Election Day, as it has in the past. In 2012, for example, President Obama faced negative economic ratings and low consumer confidence early on. But as the year went on, voters’ sentiments improved, and Obama went on to defeat Mitt Romney in the fall."

​

This is a brief overview of William Galston's insights on American voters and the 2024 U.S. election. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

​

Overview: 

This article was written by Frederick Kempe, President and CEO of the Atlantic Council, discussing the geopolitical implications of former US President Donald Trump's influence on international relations as he gains momentum in the political arena.

• Foreign governments are increasingly considering the 'Trump put'—delaying decisions in anticipation of potentially more favorable negotiations with the US if Trump returns to power, establishing a baseline for their negotiations.
• Conversely, some nations are seeking a 'Trump hedge' by preparing for the adverse effects his potential return could have on their strategic options, particularly concerning security and trade policies.

​

Key Quotes:

• “Some foreign governments are increasingly factoring into their relationship with the United States what may come to be known as the ‘Trump put’—delaying choices in the expectation they will be able to negotiate better deals with Washington a year from now.”
• “This year promises to be a year of danger as countries around the world watch US politics with a combination of disbelief, fascination, horror, and hope.”

​

What They Discuss:

• Russian President Vladimir Putin is speculated to be delaying significant decisions regarding the Ukraine war, betting on Trump's election promise to end the conflict swiftly, which could potentially favor Russia.
• European NATO members and Ukraine are exploring ways to bolster their defense capabilities in anticipation of Trump's questioning of NATO's purpose and mission, which could undermine alliance security guarantees.
• The article highlights global concerns over Trump's trade policies, including his promise to impose a ten percent tariff on all imports, affecting international trade dynamics.
• The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
• A national leader in Davos expressed concerns over the decreasing predictability of US foreign policy, which complicates other countries' policy-making processes.

​

What They Recommend:

The article implies the need for countries to adapt their strategies in anticipation of potential shifts in US foreign policy under Trump's influence, though specific recommendations are not provided.

​

Key Takeaways:

• The potential return of Donald Trump to the US presidency is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations (the 'Trump put') and others preparing for less favorable outcomes (the 'Trump hedge').
• The geopolitical landscape is marked by increased uncertainty and strategic adjustments by both US allies and adversaries in response to Trump's political resurgence.
• The evolving dynamics underscore the importance of adaptability and strategic foresight in international relations amid the unpredictability of US foreign policy.

​

This is a brief overview of Frederick Kempe's work from the Atlantic Council. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Overview:

• The article by Elaine Kamarck analyzes the results of the Republican Iowa caucus, focusing on Donald Trump's victory and its implications for the upcoming nomination race.
• Trump's win in Iowa was expected, and he secured over 50% of the vote, performing well across various voter groups.
• The race for second place was also as predicted, with Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley finishing second and third, respectively.

​

Key Quotes:

1. "Trump won Iowa with just over 50% of the vote. He didn’t exceed expectations but neither did he fall below them."
2. "The next two months are likely to settle the question once and for all: Will Trump wrap up the Republican nomination early and start the battle against Joe Biden by mid-March or will he face a fight from someone (most likely Haley) all the way to the convention?"

​

What They Discuss:

• The dynamics of the Republican nomination process as a sequence of state races, each influenced by the previous one.
• The potential impact of the Iowa results on upcoming primaries, especially in New Hampshire and South Carolina.
• The strategic positions of Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis in the race and their potential to challenge Trump.
• The unique aspects of different state electorates and how they might affect the candidates' performances.
• The importance of delegate accumulation in the nomination process, leading up to "Super Tuesday."

​

What They Recommend:

• The article does not explicitly recommend any specific actions but provides an analysis of the current political landscape and potential strategies for the candidates.

​

Key Takeaways:

• Trump's victory in Iowa sets the stage for the next primaries, with his performance likely influencing the strategies of other candidates.
• The race for the Republican nomination is still open, with potential challenges from Haley and DeSantis.
• The upcoming primaries in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and "Super Tuesday" states will be crucial in determining the Republican nominee.

​

This is a brief overview of Elaine Kamarck's work from Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Overview:

This article by Karlyn Bowman, Nate Moore, and Ruy Teixeira at the American Enterprise Institute explores the potential political impact of President Biden's support for Israel on his electoral prospects in Michigan, particularly among Muslim and Arab American voters.

• It discusses the "Abandon Biden" movement, initiated by some Muslim community leaders in response to Biden's stance on Israel, aiming to persuade Muslim and Arab Americans to vote for a third-party candidate.
• The article analyzes the significance of the Arab American vote in Michigan, a key battleground state, and weighs the potential electoral consequences for Biden.

Key Quotes:

1. "An October survey found just 17.4 percent of Arab Americans would vote for Joe Biden in a general election matchup with Donald Trump—a more than 40-point decline from 2020."
2. "The Biden administration should not sacrifice its principled foreign policy for small, short-term electoral gains."

What They Discuss:

• The article highlights the decline in President Biden's approval rating among Arab Americans and the potential impact of this shift on the 2024 election.
• It examines the electoral dynamics in Michigan, noting that while the Arab American vote is significant, it may not be sufficient alone to determine the election outcome.
• The piece considers other factors that could influence Biden's campaign in Michigan, including the enthusiasm of Black and Hispanic voters.
• It discusses the historical voting patterns of Arab Americans in Michigan and the potential for these voters to lean towards the GOP due to social conservatism, regardless of Biden's foreign policy.
• The article also addresses the potential risk of alienating Jewish voters if the Democratic stance against Israel becomes too hardline.

What They Recommend:

• Cataneo suggests that the Biden administration should maintain its foreign policy principles rather than making concessions for electoral gains.
• The article implies that the Biden campaign should focus on larger demographic groups and core Democratic constituencies, as these will have a more significant impact on the election outcome.

Key Takeaways:

• The shift in Arab American support away from Biden in Michigan reflects broader political and social trends that transcend foreign policy issues.
• While the Arab American vote is important, it is unlikely to be the sole deciding factor in Michigan's electoral outcome.
• The Biden administration faces a complex balancing act in maintaining its foreign policy stance while addressing the concerns of diverse voter groups.

This is a brief overview of Karlyn Bowman, Nate Moore, and Ruy Teixeira's work from American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.