U.S.-China Relations

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The issue:  

China has imposed new export restrictions on seven rare earth elements (REEs) essential for industries like defense and energy. This move could halt exports as a licensing system is established, leading to significant supply disruptions for U.S. firms, particularly in defense.

Go deeper:  

China accounts for 99 percent of global heavy REE processing, creating a near-monopoly that the U.S. struggles to counter. While the Department of Defense aims to develop a complete REE supply chain by 2027, current U.S. production capabilities remain underdeveloped, leaving it vulnerable. The need for international partnerships is critical to secure alternative sources and reduce reliance on China.

This is a brief overview of an article from Center for Strategic and International Studies. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full an article.

The U.S. must navigate the complexities of a potential Taiwan conflict concerning China while preventing nuclear escalation. The evolving nature of China's nuclear capabilities demands a more nuanced approach from the U.S. military, especially regarding its operational strategies, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

The issue:  

The potential for a U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan poses significant escalatory risks, particularly due to China's secure second-strike nuclear capability. This situation complicates U.S. military strategy, as any conventional strike could provoke unpredictable Chinese nuclear responses.

What they recommend:  

The report suggests that the Department of Defense (DoD) should prepare for Chinese nuclear signaling and effectively communicate strategic intentions with China. Additionally, the DoD must plan for the implications of emerging technologies on U.S.-China escalation dynamics and engage allies on their perspectives regarding Chinese thresholds for escalation.

Go deeper:  

Understanding that numerous factors influence Chinese nuclear first-use decisions, such as political stability and technological advancements, is crucial. The report identifies six specific U.S. military actions that could significantly increase the likelihood of nuclear escalation from China. Preparing for these scenarios is essential for effective crisis management and deterrence.

This is a brief overview of a report from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full report.

The potential for a Chinese invasion of Taiwan poses a significant challenge to U.S. national security. A successful invasion would not only oppress the Taiwanese people but also expand China's influence across East Asia, threatening regional stability, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

The issue:  

Taiwan faces the imminent threat of a Chinese invasion, which is complicated by outdated U.S. policies that prevent direct military support and hinder operational readiness. The U.S. struggles with logistical disadvantages, as Chinese forces are primarily based in East Asia, allowing for rapid action that U.S. forces may be unable to counter in time.  

What they recommend:  

Experts suggest that Taiwan should adopt a "porcupine" defense strategy, enhancing its asymmetrical capabilities to complicate a potential invasion. This includes fortifying beaches with obstacles and expanding the use of naval mines, which can create significant challenges for invading forces.  

Go deeper:  

Taiwan could create artificial reefs and deploy anti-vehicle obstacles to make invasion beaches less accessible, while also considering the strategic use of naval mines to disrupt Chinese naval operations. Additionally, a scorched-earth policy could be implemented to impede the restoration of key infrastructure that the PLA might capture. Collaboration with the U.S. in enhancing these defensive strategies is crucial, as they provide low-cost measures to boost Taiwan's defense capabilities.  

This is a brief overview of a commentary from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

The U.S.-China relationship currently faces significant rivalry that impacts collaboration, yet history shows that even rivals can work together on shared challenges. Understanding and advancing methods for cooperation among nonstate actors will be critical for addressing major global issues, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The issue:  

Intensifying tensions between the United States and China threaten collaboration on essential global challenges. Current data shows public perception of China is increasingly negative, with 81% of Americans expressing an unfavorable view, the highest since 1989.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

Insights from historical case studies reveal that coordinated efforts between rivals have succeeded when driven by mutual self-interest rather than goodwill. For example, U.S. and Soviet cooperation in smallpox eradication during the Cold War highlighted the political benefits of shared health goals. Such frameworks can inform contemporary U.S.-China engagement on issues like climate-smart agriculture.

This is a brief overview of an issue brief from Center for Strategic and International Studies. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full an issue brief.

Overview:  

This article was written by Bryan Burack at the Heritage Foundation.

​

• The Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy is its proactive response to China's economic strategies against the United States.
• The Biden administration, although continuing some of Trump's economic and tech policies toward China, has softened its overall approach due to concerns about perceived provocations.

​

Key Quotes:  

• "The Trump administration’s most important foreign policy legacy is its much-needed response to China’s economic warfare against the United States."
• "The Biden administration has watered down its overall approach due to fears that aggressively protecting the U.S. economy may be too provocative."

​

What They Discuss:  

• The contrasting approaches of the Trump and Biden administrations regarding U.S. economic policies towards China, with the former adopting a more antagonistic stance and the latter emphasizing engagement.
• Even while continuing some policies, the Biden administration has taken actions to reassure China, which some view as weakening the U.S. position.
• Concerns from both political spectrums that rigorous economic measures could provoke China into conflict if enforced without a strong military position.
• Arguments against the belief that the U.S. is "strangling" China's economy, pointing out that both nations remain heavily interdependent economically.
• The inevitability of decoupling in critical economic sectors as pushed by the Chinese government itself, which has been preparing to become more self-reliant.

​

What They Recommend:  

• Maintain and continue the economic and technological measures initiated by the Trump administration to reduce dependencies on China.
• Strengthen America’s defense industrial base and address supply chain vulnerabilities to ensure credible military deterrence.
• Acknowledge and prepare for the inevitability of some form of economic decoupling from China, acting from a position of strength.

​

Key Takeaways:  

• The U.S. should continue efforts to reduce reliance on China to maintain national security and economic stability.
• Assertive economic policies are essential to deter Chinese aggression effectively.
• The current U.S.-China relationship dynamic is not akin to the pre-WWII U.S.-Japan scenario in terms of economic measures.
• Decoupling in sensitive sectors is perceived as inevitable and is being actively pursued by China's own policy goals.
• Ensuring America's economic security will make the country more resilient and better positioned to counter China's growing influence.

​

This is a brief overview of the article by Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Overview:

This article was written by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

• The Chinese Communist Party's recent Third Plenum communiqué focused more on supply-side measures than demand-side initiatives, despite widespread consensus that boosting consumption is essential for sustainable growth.
• Structural, supply-side changes are vital to enhancing consumption’s role in China’s economy, but these are complex and have far-reaching consequences.

​

Key Quotes:

• "Beijing has been unable to shift the economy away from its overreliance on investment—and, more recently, on its trade surplus—to maintain high growth rates."
• "Thanks to these direct and implicit transfers, in other words, China’s extremely competitive manufacturing—and the world’s best transportation and logistical infrastructure—should not be thought of as separate from the country’s extraordinarily low domestic consumption."

​

What They Discuss:

• Consumption accounts for approximately 75% of GDP globally, but only about 53-54% in China, with investment constituting 42-43% of GDP.
• Despite general agreement among economists, China remains heavily reliant on investment rather than consumption for economic growth.
• Structural transfers in China—such as repressed interest rates and a rigorous credit system—have subsidized businesses and investment at the expense of households.
• China’s hukou system and other policies have kept wages and household income growth subdued, further limiting consumption.
• Inefficient investment, particularly in infrastructure, has led to rising local government debt without corresponding economic benefits.

​

What They Recommend:

• Implementing fiscal stimulus directed at the demand side would offer a temporary boost to household consumption but is not a sustainable long-term solution due to debt concerns.
• Gradually reversing structural transfers to allow household income to grow faster than GDP presents a more sustainable, albeit challenging, approach.
• Reforming inefficient investment practices and ensuring more resources go towards households would support sustainable consumption growth.

​

Key Takeaways:

• Boosting consumption in China is a complex challenge deeply intertwined with the country’s overall economic structure.
• Temporary fiscal measures alone are insufficient; long-term structural changes are necessary to sustainably enhance the role of consumption.
• Any significant shift in policy could potentially impact China’s manufacturing competitiveness and lead to short-term economic contractions.
• Structural reforms pose a challenge as they involve redistributing resources from businesses and local governments to households.

​

This is a brief overview of the article by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.