Feature

- Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
- While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
More on Geopolitics

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Denial Without Disaster—Keeping a U.S.-China Conflict over Taiwan Under the Nuclear Threshold
The U.S. must navigate the complexities of a potential Taiwan conflict concerning China while preventing nuclear escalation. The evolving nature of China's nuclear capabilities demands a more nuanced approach from the U.S. military, especially regarding its operational strategies, per commentary from RAND Corporation.
Advancing U.S.-China Coordination amid Strategic Competition: An Emerging Playbook
The U.S.-China relationship currently faces significant rivalry that impacts collaboration, yet history shows that even rivals can work together on shared challenges. Understanding and advancing methods for cooperation among nonstate actors will be critical for addressing major global issues, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Bring Back Trump’s China Policy
- Bryan Burack at Heritage Foundation writes that the Trump administration's significant foreign policy legacy was its strategic response to China's economic warfare against the U.S., emphasizing the importance of maintaining these measures for deterrence.
- The article asserts that the Biden administration has adopted a less assertive approach, reviving engagement policies with China due to concerns that aggressive economic protections might provoke conflict, which has led to counterproductive security tradeoffs.
Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?
- Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.
- The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.


.avif)
