The U.S. must navigate the complexities of a potential Taiwan conflict concerning China while preventing nuclear escalation. The evolving nature of China's nuclear capabilities demands a more nuanced approach from the U.S. military, especially regarding its operational strategies, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

The issue:  

The potential for a U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan poses significant escalatory risks, particularly due to China's secure second-strike nuclear capability. This situation complicates U.S. military strategy, as any conventional strike could provoke unpredictable Chinese nuclear responses.

What they recommend:  

The report suggests that the Department of Defense (DoD) should prepare for Chinese nuclear signaling and effectively communicate strategic intentions with China. Additionally, the DoD must plan for the implications of emerging technologies on U.S.-China escalation dynamics and engage allies on their perspectives regarding Chinese thresholds for escalation.

Go deeper:  

Understanding that numerous factors influence Chinese nuclear first-use decisions, such as political stability and technological advancements, is crucial. The report identifies six specific U.S. military actions that could significantly increase the likelihood of nuclear escalation from China. Preparing for these scenarios is essential for effective crisis management and deterrence.

This is a brief overview of a report from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full report.

Gender wars highlight the rise of authoritarianism globally, as seen in Georgia's struggle for democracy against Russian influence. Women leaders across various nations are pivotal in resisting these trends, emphasizing their essential role in safeguarding freedoms and rights, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

The issue:  

The erosion of women's rights is a significant indicator of authoritarianism, with women in several countries facing increasing repression. For instance, Georgian women are protesting against electoral fraud and violence, while misogyny globally has risen alongside authoritarian tendencies.

What they recommend:  

The commentary suggests that the U.S. national security community should integrate gender perspectives into its strategies and prioritize support for women's groups globally. These groups are crucial for detecting early signs of authoritarianism and enhancing democratic resilience.

Go deeper:  

Women's groups serve as important barometers for democracy, as demonstrated by Moldova's women resisting disinformation campaigns. By incorporating gender analysis into intelligence operations, the U.S. can better assess societal well-being and the health of democratic institutions. Furthermore, elevating women's roles in national security discussions can foster a deeper understanding of conflicts driven by authoritarian regimes.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

The world trading system faces significant challenges due to proposed tariffs by the U.S. president, notably a 60% tariff on China. These actions threaten to disrupt global trade and create tensions among member nations, as they debate their responses to this situation, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics. 

The issue:  

The core challenge is the potential disintegration of the rules-based international trade system, exacerbated by the proposed tariffs. A leadership deficit at the WTO has left member nations unsure about how to address trade imbalances and maintain cooperation.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

The WTO has faced serious institutional problems, including the inability to achieve binding agreements comparable to those established during the Uruguay Round 30 years ago. Without binding dispute resolution mechanisms, there is skepticism about the WTO’s effectiveness in managing future trade conflicts. It is noted that even with a leadership void, there is still hope for a coalition of willing nations to bolster the trading system moving forward.

This is a brief overview of a speech from Peterson Institute for International Economics. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full speech.

The potential for a Chinese invasion of Taiwan poses a significant challenge to U.S. national security. A successful invasion would not only oppress the Taiwanese people but also expand China's influence across East Asia, threatening regional stability, per commentary from RAND Corporation.  

The issue:  

Taiwan faces the imminent threat of a Chinese invasion, which is complicated by outdated U.S. policies that prevent direct military support and hinder operational readiness. The U.S. struggles with logistical disadvantages, as Chinese forces are primarily based in East Asia, allowing for rapid action that U.S. forces may be unable to counter in time.  

What they recommend:  

Experts suggest that Taiwan should adopt a "porcupine" defense strategy, enhancing its asymmetrical capabilities to complicate a potential invasion. This includes fortifying beaches with obstacles and expanding the use of naval mines, which can create significant challenges for invading forces.  

Go deeper:  

Taiwan could create artificial reefs and deploy anti-vehicle obstacles to make invasion beaches less accessible, while also considering the strategic use of naval mines to disrupt Chinese naval operations. Additionally, a scorched-earth policy could be implemented to impede the restoration of key infrastructure that the PLA might capture. Collaboration with the U.S. in enhancing these defensive strategies is crucial, as they provide low-cost measures to boost Taiwan's defense capabilities.  

This is a brief overview of a commentary from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Syria faces more daunting challenges than Libya did in 2011, highlighted by deep social divisions, a devastated infrastructure, and a complex geopolitical landscape. The situation calls for cautious optimism as Syrians navigate a new political reality following the fall of the Assad regime, per commentary from Chatham House.

The issue:  

Syria's transition is fraught with difficulties, including a death toll exceeding 600,000 and a significant refugee crisis. The country's infrastructure has been severely damaged, which creates a deeply fragmented society with intricate communal rifts.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

The economic instability in Syria is exacerbated by the lack of a united national interest, as its oil resources are mainly in Kurdish-controlled areas rather than widely shared. In comparison, Libya's economy depended on oil, fostering some cooperation among rival factions. Lessons from Libya highlight the risks of external meddling, which could destabilize any fragile agreements among Syrian factions.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Chatham House. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

The fires in Los Angeles highlight the urgent security threat posed by climate change, which is reshaping national security paradigms. This disconnect limits the government's response to climate disasters, putting public trust and political stability at risk, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

The issue:  

The devastating LA fires, resulting in 24 deaths and nearly 200,000 displaced residents, reflect a severe climate-driven disaster exacerbated by years of weather volatility. Estimates suggest total damages could reach up to $150 billion, straining California’s insurance markets.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

The fires illustrate how climate change acts as a "threat multiplier," enhancing the dangers of existing conditions like the Santa Ana winds. This situation complicates traditional disaster response strategies that focus primarily on armed threats rather than environmental ones. Without a political consensus on climate change, disaster management remains fraught, risking long-term resilience planning.

This is a brief overview of a research from Peterson Institute for International Economics. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full research.

Journalism is currently facing significant challenges related to staff layoffs and the rise of artificial intelligence. As automation increases, the representation of diverse voices is at risk, impacting the quality and integrity of reporting, per commentary from Brookings.

The issue:  

The journalism industry is grappling with substantial job cuts, as over 500 media professionals were laid off in January 2024 alone, mainly affecting journalists of color, who represented 42% of those laid off despite being only 17% of the workforce. This trend raises concerns about the future of journalistic integrity and the diversity of perspectives in news reporting.

What they recommend:  

Experts recommend that the integration of AI in newsrooms should be done thoughtfully, prioritizing support for journalists of color who provide valuable insights. Furthermore, they stress the need for equitable hiring practices to ensure diverse voices are included in the journalism field.

Go deeper:  

Diverse voices are crucial in combating the biases inherent in AI systems, which often reflect underrepresented groups in their training data. Historical partnerships, like that between Google and The Afro newspaper, highlight the importance of fair compensation and attribution. By employing more diverse journalists, newsrooms can enrich storytelling and help counteract the adverse effects of AI-driven narratives.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

The issue:  

Many in the U.S. believe allies do not contribute fairly to global security costs, primarily due to a focus on the 2% GDP spending target. However, data shows that 23 of the 32 NATO members met this goal last year, reflecting significant progress over the past decade.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

The updated analysis reveals that the U.S. share of global security contributions has decreased from 53% post-Cold War to around 39% in 2023. Notably, Eastern European countries are among the top contributors due to security concerns from Russia. Moreover, using metrics beyond spending, such as capabilities, can inform more tailored support requests from allies.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

The issue:  

Pentagon Spending and Ineffective Military Policy  

The American Enterprise Institute claims a Russian victory in Ukraine necessitates over $800 billion in additional Pentagon funding, despite the Defense Department's budget already exceeding $1 trillion annually. Historical evidence highlights that increased military spending has not only been ineffective but has also contributed to humanitarian crises and instability, costing over $8 trillion since 9/11.

What they recommend:  

Need for a New Approach  

Quincy Institute experts argue for a shift away from a purely military-centric foreign policy, advocating instead for strategies that prioritize peace and diplomacy. They urge a re-evaluation of military spending in light of historical failures and current geopolitical realities.

Go deeper:  

Consequences of Military-First Strategy  

The Costs of War Project shows that America's post-9/11 conflicts resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and thousands of veterans suffering from injuries, all while failing to achieve strategic objectives. The report points out that Russia's current military performance in Ukraine reveals significant flaws, indicating that increasing U.S. military spending would not effectively counter a weakened adversary. Moreover, it calls for European allies to enhance their military capabilities to reduce reliance on U.S. forces.

This is a brief overview of a policy analysis from Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full policy analysis.

Trump's proposed tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China could harm all involved economies, including the US. These measures aim to tackle illegal immigration and drug flows, according to a commentary by experts at Peterson Institute for International Economics.

​

The issue:  

Trump intends to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and a 10% tariff on China to address illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking. These tariffs threaten to disrupt highly integrated economies, potentially reducing US GDP by $200 billion and significantly slowing growth in all affected countries.

​

What they recommend:  

Experts advise renegotiating the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to avoid the economic damage from imposing tariffs. They suggest making concessions within the agreement to address US concerns and prevent the need for tariff imposition.

​

Go deeper:  

The analysis utilizes the G-Cubed model to project extensive GDP losses and increased inflation across the US, Mexico, Canada, and China if the tariffs are implemented. Mexico, heavily reliant on US exports, faces catastrophic economic impacts, potentially exacerbating illegal immigration incentives. Historical patterns indicate that Trump may not follow through on his tariff threats, as seen during his previous administration.

​

This is a brief overview of the commentary by experts at Peterson Institute for International Economics. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.